After the controversial news shared earlier this week by Mozilla’s new CEO that Firefox will evolve into “a modern AI browser,” the company now revealed it is working on an AI kill switch for the open-source web browser.

On Tuesday, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation, the company behind the beloved Firefox web browser used by almost all GNU/Linux distributions as the default browser.

In his message as new CEO, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo stated that Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software while remaining the company’s anchor, and that Firefox will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

What was not made clear is that Firefox will also ship with an AI kill switch that will let users completely disable all the AI features that are included in Firefox. Mozilla shared this important update earlier today to make it clear to everyone that Firefox will still be a trusted web browser.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        Why put the user through the issue of turning it off instead of having it off by default and letting those who want to use it turn it on? That’s some bullshit on Mozilla’s end. Fuck them.

  • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Well they’re clearly not taking it all that seriously as it should be an Opt-IN feature, not an Opt-Out. They’re banking on a majority non tech savvy userbase to not even bother disabling it. fine, whatever, that’s on the user.

    But it’s just more Firefox bloat that I have zero desire to deal with. If I wanted bloat in my browser I’d go use Vivaldi.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    Too little, too late. I already switched and won’t be returning as long as the CEO is still employed there.

    Anthony Enzor-DeMeo can suck a dick and die in a fire. I hope your company fails due to your disastrous decisions.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    50 minutes ago

    Mozilla shared this important update earlier today to make it clear to everyone that Firefox will still be a trusted web browser.

    It would be trusted if that shit wasn’t in there to start with. Isn’t firefox like the big “extensions” browser? Why not make this an extension that people could download if they’re stupid enough to want it?

    They’re acting like they’re Microsoft tying IE to Windows 98.

  • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Y’know what’s even better than a Kill-switch?

    Not including it at all.

    And that’s why I’ve switched to Waterfox, which honestly, everyone should, show them that it’s not good enough, by switching browser.

    !waterfox@programming.dev

  • titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    This is a response to all the backlash. Oops, we"forgot" to mention you can completely turn this all off… (Quick, vibe code a kill switch guys!)

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Good enough I guess?

    But why spend resources on useless features that nobody asked for and nobody’s going to take advantage of? Instead of, you know, implementing anything that may benefit the users?

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      It’s opt-out, so the majority of users who don’t even know about it will keep it on. That means Mozilla gets to steal their data and use it for profit, even if they don’t interact with it directly.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Why not start with disabling it by default and see how many people switch it on?

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The real issue is not whether we are going to be force-fed this features or not, but the fact that a foundation with limited resources is going to spend any sizable amount of them developing a solution its users are not interested in.

    Waiting for Ladybird at this point.

    • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      These guys played host to one of the tech world’s most prominent homophobes for decades. I like the browser but the foundation has been trying to fuck everything up since the beginning of the web.

      • markko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        According to your link below he was co-founder of Mozilla in 1998. Based on the other information on that page, he had a very significant role in shaping Mozilla and their tools, so as disagreeable as his personal views may be, it’s not impossible that Firefox might not even exist today were it not for his work there.

        Someone else has already pointed out that he was pushed out, but he actually resigned due to public pressure (he was only CEO for 11 days, and one of the board members even left due to him being appointed) before going on to found Brave and becoming the CEO there lol.

        If I chose not to use products based on the personal beliefs of the people who worked on them I don’t think I’d have very many options. Mozilla has made heaps of questionable decisions over the years, but the other options are generally much worse.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The reason the “kill-switch” wasn’t made clear originally was because it literally didn’t exist until users very vocally tool them where to shove their AI crap.

    It was added on afterwards.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      What? They’ve been talking about features that are now being called the “kill switch” for the better part of a year. Literally all they did that’s new was give it a dumb name.

      • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Just to point out that per the discussion in the screenshot: Synthetic datasets are typically generated from models that were trained by poverty-pay Kenyans. This is basically ethics-washing.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The trust was lost when they said nonsense like “AI browser” as of that means anything concrete.