She has been arguing that, as a Christian, she should not have to follow state rules about judicial impartiality.
A judge who cannot separate their religious bias of what is right and wrong from their role as a judge (the impartial arbiter of law as set forth through the political process), isn’t just saying the separation of church and state shouldn’t apply to marriage. They’re also saying they cannot legitimately sit as a judge because they cannot keep personal bias separate from their role as a fair and neutral arbiter. She’s telling on herself.
How do you even become a State judge without knowing the US Constitution?
The same way you become president without knowing anything about civics
Corruption? Or faking it till they don’t need to like a lot of fascist now
Up until a decade ago the Constitution officially said nothing about gay marriage. Roe was precedent for half a century.