• Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If you mean the 34 felonies, that judge effectively said his punishment would be nothing. Which is very fun by the way - when has a non rich person gotten to shrug off dozens of felony convictions? He was never charged, as far as I’m aware, in connection to the coup attempt.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Impeachments without a result are also convictions without consequences. If anything they showed him he could do whatever he wanted, so he has.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Gonna get real pedantic here. It’s passé that “impeachment” is the part the House of Representatives does, then the Senate gets their vote. If 2/3 of the Senage agree the person did the bad, this means they are “convicted” by the Senate which automatically leads to removal from office. So, a conviction in reference to the broader “impeachment” process comes with very real consequences, by definition.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes, you’re right, an acquittal does mean not convicted. Even when the general attitude among the Republicans wasn’t that the impeachment findings were wrong, just that it wasn’t a big deal to them (mainly concerning the first time, but I guess also the second since storming the Capitol wasn’t enough to change their mind). So again the message was sent that he had free reign.