By the time anyone is asking for one more lane you need seven times as many lanes as they have. People will ignorantly drives closer than the 3 seconds following distance safety requires. Little Des moines needs Houstin levels, while Houstin needs ten levels of bridges. I can offer no help paying for that.
I mean… I had written something about 5 extra lanes… then I got stuck wondering if that was per-side, and decided to solve my mental conundrum with an Elon Musk joke…
It’s cool though, we can put a 5 lane elevated bikeway in the middle… that’ll fix it 😉
But I mean, congestion usually has a place where it begins, adding more lanes behind it makes 0 sense. Or perhaps removing lanes would make more sense, as then cars wouldn’t have to merge in such big numbers.
In reality, the answer is trains. Tracks everywhere, and very frequent runs.
Just one more lane bro, I swear. I just need one more lane and we’ll solve traffic.
By the time anyone is asking for one more lane you need seven times as many lanes as they have. People will ignorantly drives closer than the 3 seconds following distance safety requires. Little Des moines needs Houstin levels, while Houstin needs ten levels of bridges. I can offer no help paying for that.
I mean… I had written something about 5 extra lanes… then I got stuck wondering if that was per-side, and decided to solve my mental conundrum with an Elon Musk joke…
It’s cool though, we can put a 5 lane elevated bikeway in the middle… that’ll fix it 😉
Friend, the only solution to traffic is fewer cars and better alternatives to driving.
But I mean, congestion usually has a place where it begins, adding more lanes behind it makes 0 sense. Or perhaps removing lanes would make more sense, as then cars wouldn’t have to merge in such big numbers.
In reality, the answer is trains. Tracks everywhere, and very frequent runs.
Trains, trams, bike lanes walkable neighborhood, even busses. Anything but goddamn cars.