It’s not the general public’s fault that AI was released before it was ready for prime time. It’s not like the word “slop” was picked out of a hat, either. AI earned the word with its laughably bad output.
I’ll make the CEO a deal, though. If AIs stop producing slop, I won’t call it slop anymore.
Microsoft Copilot is the tip of the spear for the firm, powered entirely by ChatGPT and Microsoft’s savvy early investments in OpenAI.
“Savvy”? Really? I think it’s years too early to make that assessment.
Indeed, in closing, Nadella seems to admit that AI doesn’t truly have “societal permission” right now, referencing widespread backlash and mockery that continues to dog the technology.
What kind of “permission” is he looking for? Permission to steal and ignore copyright? Permission to build untold numbers of data centers and do vast environmental damage? Permission to lie and sell a substandard product? He probably wants all three, and more.
The permission he’s talking about is being seen as cool or normal. This whole thing is him whining that we think his loser product that causes more problems than it solves is a loser product that causes more problems than it solves
I think he’s trying to do the bullshit of creating a sense that people who utilize GPT systems are somehow repressed class in some fashion. I don’t think that the term about cognitive amplification is intended to truly mean that, so much as create the sense that if you aren’t treating it like that output is equal that somehow you’re being judgmental unfairly.
Basically he doesn’t want output from those things to be graded on an equal playing field with stuff that wasn’t created that way, because he knows it fucking fails.
It’s not the general public’s fault that AI was released before it was ready for prime time. It’s not like the word “slop” was picked out of a hat, either. AI earned the word with its laughably bad output.
I’ll make the CEO a deal, though. If AIs stop producing slop, I won’t call it slop anymore.
“Savvy”? Really? I think it’s years too early to make that assessment.
What kind of “permission” is he looking for? Permission to steal and ignore copyright? Permission to build untold numbers of data centers and do vast environmental damage? Permission to lie and sell a substandard product? He probably wants all three, and more.
The permission he’s talking about is being seen as cool or normal. This whole thing is him whining that we think his loser product that causes more problems than it solves is a loser product that causes more problems than it solves
I think he’s trying to do the bullshit of creating a sense that people who utilize GPT systems are somehow repressed class in some fashion. I don’t think that the term about cognitive amplification is intended to truly mean that, so much as create the sense that if you aren’t treating it like that output is equal that somehow you’re being judgmental unfairly.
Basically he doesn’t want output from those things to be graded on an equal playing field with stuff that wasn’t created that way, because he knows it fucking fails.