Pearl@lemmy.ml to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoMetal Exclusionary Radical Astronomylemmy.mlimagemessage-square260fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down134file-text
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageMetal Exclusionary Radical Astronomylemmy.mlPearl@lemmy.ml to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square260fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up110arrow-down6·3 days agoThe non-Hydrogen, non-Helium atoms are a larger proportion of total mass, but that’s just because they’re really fat.
minus-squareTaldan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoIt looks like this chart is based on mass, rather than number. By number hydrogen is >90% by itself
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up62arrow-down1·3 days agoWe don’t call them fat. They’re BBA: big beautiful atoms. Thicc would suffice too.
minus-squaredohpaz42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·3 days agoThe 12 yo in me is giggling like crazy right now.
minus-squareicelimit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-22 days agoWhat are you doing with a 12yo inside you?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 days agoWould be a lot cooler if those were scaled accordingly
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThere is scaling going on there, just not 1:1. Like the hydrogen is smaller than the rest, but it should be about half the size of the one above.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoIt’s barely perceptible. I just see a rainbow of butts.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoWe’ve all had dreams Lee that.
minus-squarecryoistalline@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·3 days agoits a vocal minority, don’t pay them any attention
minus-squarevery_well_lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·3 days agoThat’s not true. The “fatness” of metallic atoms doesn’t even come close to overcoming how rare they are. Hydrogen and helium combined still make up ~98% of the total mass fraction. Oxygen, which is next in line, is only about 1% the total mass.
minus-squarebjorney@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-23 days agoThey said “larger proportion”, and 2% is larger than 1% /s
The non-Hydrogen, non-Helium atoms are a larger proportion of total mass, but that’s just because they’re really fat.
It looks like this chart is based on mass, rather than number. By number hydrogen is >90% by itself
We don’t call them fat. They’re BBA: big beautiful atoms. Thicc would suffice too.
The 12 yo in me is giggling like crazy right now.
What are you doing with a 12yo inside you?
Better than reverse
Would be a lot cooler if those were scaled accordingly
There is scaling going on there, just not 1:1. Like the hydrogen is smaller than the rest, but it should be about half the size of the one above.
It’s barely perceptible. I just see a rainbow of butts.
We’ve all had dreams Lee that.
Not really
its a vocal minority, don’t pay them any attention
That’s not true. The “fatness” of metallic atoms doesn’t even come close to overcoming how rare they are. Hydrogen and helium combined still make up ~98% of the total mass fraction. Oxygen, which is next in line, is only about 1% the total mass.
They said “larger proportion”, and 2% is larger than 1%
/s
Actually, it’s twice as large!