• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Linux/Mac combo covers just about every computing requirement, even for corporate users. You do not need Windows unless you play competitive online multiplayer games.

    Me:

    Mac -

    • Music production software
    • Adobe software
    • Some corporate VPNs and VDI access required by some clients
    • Corporate MS software required by some clients

    Linux -

    • Everything else
    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You do not need Windows unless you play CERTAIN competitive online multiplayer games.

      • redbrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        or unless something cryptic breaks on Linux and no one on the inner net can figure it out.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I left Windows 15 years ago (still have to use it for work every so often)… I have yet to encounter something cryptic breaking on Linux

          When the things go wrong on Linux, which in my experience is rare, you are basically in Windows territory: reboot if you don’t know how to fix it or reformat/reinstall which is 10 times faster anyway

          Right now, my daily driver is a branch of a branch (Garuda Linux which is fork of a branch of Manjaro which itself is a branch of Arch)… it comes with KDE as desktop which is awesome but I felt like experimenting with Hyprland which is not even at version 1.0 yet… and I basically configured it from scratch myself… I also share this box with my son who does use KDE as his desktop which is actually not recommended (KDE Plasma and Hyprland in the same box, I mean)

          As per any advice you will find out there, this machine should be like the crazy robot in Futurama that explodes with no warning at any little thing and yet, it’s my daily driver for work, daily gamer for my son… rock solid and smooth… I have had 1 odd freeze I chose not to wait out and just rebooted the box in 9 months, and the freeze happened accessing Windows365 Desktop… go figure

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Depends on what end of the corporate world you are working in. I do industrial automation, and there’s no way you are getting out of having a Windows VM at the very least.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, for that pretty much everyone uses Windows VMs on Windows as well

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        For sure. I actually detailed our VDI setup in another thread. We use linux minipcs running VMWare and Win10 IOT LTSC VMs to connect to clients that require Windows or “secured Windows” where they install all sorts of bloatware.

        EDIT: I should note that the vast majority of our clients have since moved to VDIs, which can be accessed from Macs. Unfortunately, they mostly use Citrix and I have not found a way to get that citrix client to work well on Linux.

    • gustofwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Macs can also make a good home server because the m chips are quite powerful relative to their power draw

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They all have their drawbacks. If I could install MacOS on my laptop I would. But you can only install it on overpriced, irreparable, disposable hardware.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The right tool for the job is what I always say. Macs, especially on Apple Silicone, are next to impossible to beat for music production. The performance of those chips and the universal support from hardware and software manufacturers make it the best tool. What I find is that the number of scenarios in which Windows is the best tool is rapidly approaching zero.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Seems like an overpriced, irreparable, unupgradeable, and disposable tool would be the wrong tool but what do I know.

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I get your point but the truth is that Apple’s M processors do a far better job than Intel and AMD processors do when it comes to this type of work. I started on Linux with Reaper and BitWig but the Macs performance was significantly better. Also, software and hardware support is key. All music gear manufacturers and software vendors support apple, including Apple silicone. You can run many VSTs through comparability layers but the latency is a huge problem and the alteady high CPU demands get exacerbated.

            I have been on Linux since very early days and have always been a proponent of it. Music production is just not an niche that is currently as well covered by Linux as it is by Mac. We need a Linux push in music like the one Valve did in gaming. If Abelton and Native Instruments went all in on Linux, I think much of the industry would follow.