• SirDerpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      If the majority was logical then we’d have been revolting for the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the passing of the Interstate Branching and Banking Efficiency Act.

      I think it’s far more important to encourage wisdom than pretend to play whack-a-mole with bank-owned politicians.

      What do you think?

      • celeste@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        How do you propose we go about changing this? How do we effectively encourage it?

        I think that purely logical thought is impossible, and believing we are a logical person can lead us to assume all our opinions are logical, inherently. Which leads to using after the fact logic to justify initial gut reactions. Is that what you mean by wisdom? The ability to understand your own emotional reaction and decide if it’s based on anything useful? Or is it something else?

        I think, at this point in time, celebrity culture is important to be aware of. Trump was a reality tv star, after all. I think a better world could be made if society didn’t care about celebrities, but that is not where we live, and observing reality seems an important step to understanding it. And understanding it can help us determine if there is a way to alter this. If that’s the goal. Is that the purpose to your questions?

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          How do you propose we go about changing this? How do we effectively encourage it?

          You’re witnessing one very small act of praxis right now. But, my best results are always IRL, personal, in a recurring one-on-one or small group discussion. And, I’m not to lead that discussion, instead following where the others lead, the only boundary logical fallacy.

          A poor summary would be “Agency at all costs.” But, a good answer to your question would require a very lengthy response. My greatest influence in means is Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire (1968). But, there’s so many good tools, from the New Testament to the emotional delivery of Malcolm X. Being able to adapt is critical. Perhaps most important is to risk making it personal.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Now that the main glut of whatever has passed, I want to express that your post above, particularly your question, made my day. It’s perhaps the best question I’ve been asked engaging with .world. Thank you.