Harris may have been light on policy, but she was able to bait an ‘unhinged’ Trump into a number of traps

  • ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    She could at least answer most of the questions in a reasonably direct way.

    But it does make my eyes roll when it’s a yes or no question and people ramble. Just say yes or no and then ramble.

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      She answered coherently but rarely in a direct way. I heard 3 numbers and 0 policy positions other than Roe V Wade

      I did miss the first 30 min so

      Trump didn’t answer anything and just attacked which is fucking pathetic

      • ravhall@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        She made firm statements on a number of topics. None as firm as RvW, lol. She really came down hard on that one. I would like to see more of that.

        I would not say that I am thrilled with her as a candidate, but at least now I don’t feel like I’m throwing my vote away just to keep Trump out of office. I’m sure she will be a fine president, and since she has the support of so many Republicans at this point I think she has more of a chance at that “bipartisan” thing everyone keeps yapping about.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re expecting the wrong thing if you are watching a debate with trump involved and think you’re going to hear policy. That’s not what debate are for.

        • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just because Trump is involved doesn’t mean it is no longer a debate.

          The factyou think this is the reason your country is FUCKED