• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’d be easy to remove this post for a violation of Rule 3’s requirement on high-quality sources, but this is textbook leopards, so we’ll work around it.

    Pinning this comment so everyone has easy access to the ACLU’s press release about this lawsuit which is likely to be a much better source. Here’s a Charlotte Observer article about the attack. And here’s the Newsweek article quoting MS NOW about the regret.

    Maybe I should have a canned explanation for how trash the IBT is as a source, but as a proxy for that: we don’t use it as much as we reasonably can on Wikipedia (a source which, funnily, I’ve seen the IBT cite for claims not about Wikipedia).

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Tangent: I would love to see a Lemmy feature that allows community mods to unilaterally block links to specific domains within their community. So, in this case, the poster would get an immediate notification that their post was not allowed due to the link being to a low quality source, and a suggestion to find the same story on a more reputable site.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          agreed, but when verifying, a broad consensus among shitty sources works when you can’t find good sources.

          we found the charlotte observer tho so like, why newsweek.