Because they operate in bad faith and cannot be trusted.
Because they operate in bad faith and cannot be trusted.
There is something to that, in that money gained will be kept (unless lawsuits can claw it away for fraud), but with both scenarios the ethically lacking individual would still have enjoyed the time until they were caught and future money/clout would both be hampered.
As for competition, that sounds the same to me. There is already competition for positions and grants, etc.
OK, so money corrupts, money exists, everything is corrupt. What’s the point of pointing that out?
So I guess every reaction and review on the internet that is ad supported or behind a payroll is theft too?
That’s only because money exists. If you removed money from the equation, clout would be the new currency that everyone lies and cheats for.
This kind of behavior would still exist without money. People would still fake stuff for the clout.
Once I got Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles for my birthday, I just so happened to do something (don’t remember what) to get grounded from TV/Nintendo for a month. I read that manual so many times over the next month. Not sure I ever actually beat that game.
As someone in the industry, every organization has to balance cost to benefits. If it costs $10k to intercomnect two low priority systems vs having each person have to double enter, they’re gonna prioritize higher priority things.