Can someone explain to me how my state got everything else right for the most part but went stupid for this one?

Literally, let’s inspect little girls privates, but not boys, because 10 trans students exist and MIGHT want to play sports with their friends? Jesus.

It was also kind of disgusting that literally all our state initiatives were funded by a 1%-er, Brian Heywood and his Let’s Go Washingtion PAC.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Certainly the people implementing these bills and initiatives have a better sense of reality than the idiots voting for them, and so thus must have some sort of even worse goal… Right?

    Like, maybe their goal is to just split people, and isn’t entirely horrific laws based on pure fear, ignorance, and bigotry… Right?

    …right?

    I’m so tired.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Relax everyone. Conservatives only want to inspect the athletic girls’ genitals. It’s not like they are trying to look at non-athletic girls or even naked boys. That would be gross and immoral.

    Each young, athletic girl who has genitals that are capable of passing a detailed inspection with a rating of 7 out of 10 or higher will be permitted to play girl-sports in public for everyone to look at, record and enjoy. And to prevent any criticism from the libs, all genital inspections will need to be video recorded. For safety of course. And then reviewed by men who are officially qualified as authentic conservatives. For safety. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

    • Squidious@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Why are genital exams required? Don’t they already already have a copy of everones birth certificate?

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Genital exams are required because conservatives are pedophiles. It really is that simple.

        FUN FACT: Conservatives are biologically unable to experience empathy. This is why they are unable to view women or children as humans. Humanizing others requires empathy.

        • Squidious@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          A statement from your doctor does not mean a genital exam. I have to get a statement from my doctor for my son to go to summer camp that says he has no physical limitations. That part of the new rules is no big deal. The discussion should be about rights, not this hyperbolic calling everyone a pedo.

          • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Hey now, that’s not fair. It’s not hyperbolic to call conservatives pedophiles. It is a fact that they chose a proud and well known child predator as their best representative out of everyone else in the nation.

            They chose him as their most accurate representation three times over a decade, knowing full well that he “likes 'em young”, likes to go into teen dressing rooms uninvited so he can see them nude, and grabs women by their genitals without consent. According to conservatives themselves, no one more accurately represents them than Trump. No one.

            It’s not just Trump. Conservatives consistently choose child predators as their most accurate representatives. I think its disrespectful to conservatives to ignore their chosen avatars. They insist on aligning with pedophiles and we should respect that choice and refer to them as such.

  • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Serious question: does this explicitly say that the person whose job it is to inspect the genitals of girls cannot touch the girls?

    If not, there’s almost certainly going to be a pedo in this position taking advantage of this new rule to touch underage girls’ genitalia

    • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The article says statement from their healthcare provider, so they should be subject to the Hippocratic oath.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    They’re not banned from sports, they just don’t get to pick their team.

    Just like everybody else.

    Everyone needs to have a medical exam to play already, just as they have for the past 50+ years

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Can someone explain to me how my state got everything else right for the most part but went stupid for this one?

    If that’s an actual question, my guess at an answer is that since this election’s blue wave was more voting against Republicans than for Democrats, it’s not a sign of fundamental change among the electorate. People mostly still believe today what they believed a few years ago (though there’s clear leftward shift), and one of the few genuinely popular things Republicans have is their anti-trans agenda. Therefore when typically Republican-leaning people got to vote on it, they voted against Republicans and simultaneously against trans rights. This is doubly so because trans women in sports is one issue where Republicans can actually make a seemingly rational (but wrong) argument for their case.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Some things lag in politics. Trans kids in sports are the new boogeyman so most people have a hard time accepting the premise. If trans kids are going to be excluded we at least need to focus on education and general acceptance. When I was in high school pretty much nobody was openly gay although I like to think we wouldn’t have treated them like lepers (probably would have). Meeting LGBTQ people in college was common though and a lot of us got over our fears and misconceptions. I’ve met maybe 3-4 trans people in my entire life but in actuality it was probably more because they didn’t feel safe to present as the opposite gender. Unfortunately I think it will take time to get over the initial shock and the best we can do is to try and defend their right to self-determination and encourage them to be who they are so everyone can see this is really no big deal.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    17 hours ago

    We won the war but lost the battle… Also this is sure to get sued and challenged as it’s a direct discrimination based on sex and title IX prohibits that shit

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The State Constitution also prohibits this. It will hopefully never take effect because a state court must shut this down.

      It wouldn’t be the first right-wing ballot initiative to go directly into the trash in this state.

  • savvie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The measure says students in elementary, middle and high school who want to join girls’ athletics must first submit statements from their healthcare providers verifying their “biological sex”. Opponents have raised alarms the measure may force girls to endure “invasive and extreme” genital exams to participate in school sports.

    • jve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What the fuck.

      And specifically targeting girls. How the fuck does something like this even get on the ballot?

      • Malica@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Thankfully it’s got a good shot at being ruled unconstitutional, assuming the supreme court doesn’t fuck that up too.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Brian Heywood, a republican millionaire who moved to WA from California to “escape liberals”, has been abusing the ballot initiative system here using his wealth for years. He (and his PAC “Let’s Go Washington”) purposefully makes them misleading or otherwise confusing to understand in order to get them passed.

        A silver lining is that most of his initiatives haven’t passed (such as the initiative to repeal the millionaire tax), and those few that have over the years have been gutted, heavily modified, or found to be unconstitutional in the state supreme court. The supreme court here just became even more left leaning, and since the way he wrote the initiative makes it only apply to girls, it’s likely to be thrown out.

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The measure “may” force girls to endure invasive and extreme genital exams? I’m pretty sure having one’s genitals examined, especially when a minor, is invasive and extreme.

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I wonder if they’re required to satisfy the federal standard for sex identification. That would require more than a genital exam. It would require capturing a zygote.

      Pretty invasive.

      • Carl@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It would require capturing a zygote.

        Did you mean capturing a gamete? As in, a viable sperm cell or egg? Which proves that the individual is biologically capable of producing those gametes, which means they are capable of producing viable offspring?

        Because capturing a zygote (a viable egg that has been successfully fertilized by a viable sperm cell, but hasn’t yet implanted itself on the uterine wall to become an embryo) would require a woman to have a fertilized egg. And I feel like requiring impregnation just to confirm sex is a little… Impractical?

        It would mean positively identifying males would be impossible, because they’re not capable of carrying a zygote at all. That that’s before we even get into the whole “in order to confirm an elementary school girl is biologically female so she can compete, the doctor would first need to impregnate her to create a zygote” thing.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Will I don’t support the ban. This seems a little over the top. Invasive and extreme? Any kid getiing regual exams yearly by their doctor get a genital check. That is enough I am sure. Where it gets complicated is with the poor, who can’t afford to have a regular pediatrician. But sadly they usually can’t afford to play school sports often. So there are a ton of problems with all this, like a ton. But I don’t think there are going to be any invasive and extreme exams as a result. With all the real problems this creates, can’t we just stick to those?

      • Malica@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My kid didn’t, I was told vaginal exams only start when they become sexually active.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Vaginal exam is more than is needed to confirm boy vs girl. The docs always just lifted the underwear and looked for any sign of abnormalities that might need treatment. No poking or touching even needed.

      • WatermelonPaloma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t remember getting my genitals looked at in regular exams when I was young. Regardless of that, these are NOT health exams–they are to inspect the genitals of the child. That is extreme as fuck. These genital inspections are discriminatory, as boys do not have to submit to them. How anyone could accept this, let alone vote for it, is absolutely insane.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They aren’t requiring a specific exam. They are just requiring a doctor to sign off that they are biologically a boy or girl. This basically come down to lifting the underwear and looking down, which is what is normally done at an early are to check for abnormalities that may need to be addressed. No touching even need to take place. At a very young age, like pre 1 or so, they do a bit more detailed checking for issues. So if you have the same doc, they could sign off based on that alone.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Kind of weird how people claim to love democracy but want to overturn the will of its voters when its something they disagree with.

      Funny enough this one passing really goes to show how stupid most voters seem to be in WA now.

      They literally want to overturn one law they voted for years ago and they want to have a state supreme court who have all agreed that the incoming millionaire tax can go ahead even if it breaks the states constitution.

      The state Dems need some real DSA competition because at this point it’s all pointing towards corporatacy with a veiled control of an oligarchy.

      I would ask our WA incumbents to reveal their minutes behind closed doors with lobbyists and full financial disclosures to be reviewed by a non political backed watchdog but the very same court we just voted in said “go pound cold wet sand”

      • Blibly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Nah its not weird to want to overturn stupid harmful bullshit built on bigoted misinformation.

        Democracy isn’t JUST voting for things and dealing with it. It’s the entire process within which there are mechanisms to overturn dumb illegal bullshit. Bullshit like subjecting young girls to molestation to soothe nazi hysteria.

        Agreed with more DSA reps though no argument there.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Hey it’s the guy that voted Yes on repealing the millionaires tax in Washington. I wonder what other initiatives from Brian Heywood you voted Yes on. Maybe this one?

        Going against a misleading discriminatory bill is not “going against the will of the people”. It’s funny that you’d say that, and in the same breath complain about the millionaire’s tax that you voted to repeal failing.

        • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The user you responded to exists to shit on the WA legislature, and let the Washington Lemmy community know they voted to repeal the millionaire tax. They’re more upset about that failing than the anti trans one passing.

        • Carl@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, and this is why being an informed voter is so difficult. There was one initiative on my ballot that was worded like “create funding for programs to reduce homelessness.” Sounds nice, right? Sounds progressive? Sounds like something I’d want, for sure!

          After googling it, it was basically just giving tons of money to cops… So that the cops can buy new tactical gear, to march into homeless camps like jackboots and beat the shit out of homeless people while torching all of their stuff. But sure, it’s “reducing homelessness.” I guess if we tear down the homeless camps and violently chase all of the homeless people out of town, there are no more homeless people? That’s how it works, right?

  • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If you get an explanation, let me know. I’m dumbfounded by this one.

    Nearly every other thing I voted on went the way I expected/voted, off the top of my head the only ones that didn’t were a state supreme court race and a local city election.

    How did we get the other two state initiatives right but this one wrong??

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I don’t like it, but I can get how it passed. Some league called the cops on a three year old becuase he was too good and the parents of the other kids wanted him gone. People feel strongly about fair play. And so they are susceptible to the propaganda. The “problem” is total BS, but it plays on a common emotion not matter your party affiliation.

    All in all. There is very little balance in school sports anyway. Team sports especially. In those, the school with more money usually finds a way to win. So even if someone feels it isn’t fair to have a transgirl compete with women… there are much bigger sources of unfairness out there. But this one feels like something they can do something about. So again the propoganda ends up working. :(