• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    The TSA is something that shouldn’t exist in its current form. They very often fail their audit checks and normalize invading your privacy to an extreme degree like body scanners and pat downs. If water bottles are considered potentially explosive then why dump them on a bin next to a line of people where they can go off? This is low grade security theater that inconveniences passengers at best.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s security theater through and through.

      Apart from the obvious failings of these checks, think about what kind of damage a single backpack of explosives can do to a packed airport during holiday season. You can literally put a ton of explosives on one of those trolleys, roll it into the waiting area and kill 200 people easily. No security whatsoever involved.

      Reality is, most security measures are designed to keep the illusion of control. Nothing more. Penetration testers show again and again that you can easily circumvent practically all barriers or measures.

      • Tamo240@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The goal is not to stop the people in the queue being attacked, its to stop someone boarding a plane with the means to hijack it

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          They fail gloriously at at that too.

          Whenever they get tested the red teams manage to smuggle in everything needed to hijiack a plane plus a kitchen sink.

          The few times that terrorists tried to board planes, they made it through security and were caught by other passengers.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, and you don’t need the TSA for that. Just do as they already do: lock the cockpit.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s basically the only type of jobs program that both sides of our broken government can agree on: petty nonsense that looks like it might do something useful, but really doesn’t, and only inconveniences the poors.

    • fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      According to the story I heard as to the origin of the “no liquids over X amount” rule, years ago there was a terrorist that tried to smuggle hydrogen peroxide and acetone - which can be used to rather easily synthesize triacetone triperoxide (TATP, a highly sensitive explosive) - onto a plane in plastic toiletry bottles. They got caught and foiled somehow, and then the TSA started restricting liquids on planes. This was in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, if I recall correctly.

      And I happen to know, from a reliable source, of someone who accidentally made TATP in a rotary evaporator in an academic lab. So it seems plausible.

      Not that the rule is actually effective prevention against similar attacks, nor that the TSA even knows what the reason is behind what they do at this point, haha. I just thought it was an interesting story.

      • m4xie@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        hydrogen peroxide and acetone

        So there are worse cleaning chemicals to mix than bleach and vinegar

        • fermionsnotbosons@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Requires an acid catalyst for the reaction to actually proceed, but yeah, could definitely ruin your day - although a lungful of chlorine gas is nothing to sneeze at either.

    • stalfoss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Notice the footnote on every TSA webpage that their officers can always change the rules on the spot if they feel like it. So it’s always a gamble.

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The tap water in Canberra, Australia is the tastiest I’ve tried out of the ~20-50 municipalities I’ve sampled in Australia, Western and Southern Europe, the US, China, Taiwan and Vietnam.

          Also the US is not a third world nation, it’s a developing nation. Or under-developed would be more accurate, but that’s not a popular term. The US is a first world nation by definition, since first world just means the US global empire and it’s allies.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It tasted better in Canberra before the 2013 bushfire, back when it was filtered through pine needles, before they removed all the pine farms

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Big caveat

      The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ah yes, the “rules only apply when I say they do” rule. Much legitimate.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Inconsistent enforcement of “the rules” is the most common form of systematic marginalization.

          It’s also easy of centrists to excuse, since it could happen to anyone, even when the statistic show to it is overwhelmingly correlated with some protected trait.

  • StThicket@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve actually done this successfully. TSA agent knocked on it, and said no problem.

    If i somehow would be stopped, I’d love to argue what is liquid or not, and what could be liquid if it’s just hot enough.