“Thundermail” will be part of a suite of Thunderbird Pro services, as the team behind the venerable Mozilla email client begins building a complete ecosystem.

  • nothingcorporate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    A way for Mozilla to make money that isn’t ads? Count me in.

    Remember kids, without Mozilla, there is no Librewolf, no Waterfox, and no Thunderbird.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 day ago

    I for one see this as a very positive development. This is the way to make money without selling out your users but by making them your customers. Honestly I really didn’t want to use gmail as a mail provider, but I wanted to use my own domain for emails so I had to do complicated setups with MXRoute which normal people can’t do. I still have to pay MXRoute and because I’m using Thunderbird as my mail client both on desktop and phone, I might as well switch to Thundermail.

    Compared to what is happening with Firefox, I think Thunderbird has been on the right track for many years now. And I’m not alone with this assessment, you can see it on the donations basically doubling every year.

    Even their AI experiments they communicate that it will be running locally very cautiously, I’m telling you guys, this is the way. Not by alienating potential customers with a shift towards advertisers but instead offering them a solution to a problem they have (mail hosting) and which is really close to the core business and a natural fit.

    Same with Thunderbird Send and Thunderbird Appointment, those are things around email which now are kind of hard to do for people and other clients have it build in like Outlook with Sharepoint and the build in scheduling assistant. With Thunderbird you need to know about something like Doodle and do it on the side manually.

    • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially one that’s now selling your data. If Mozilla did this instead of selling our personal information, that would have been great. But here we are.

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Can you explain what you mean by selling your data? I’m not intimately familiar with the controversy, but it was my understanding that they’re not really selling it, it’s just some weird legal ramifications that come with the term “selling” or something?

        • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          They tried to weasel out of saying that they sell your data, claiming that the CA law has an absurd definition. But the CA law just defines the term how any reasonable person would: the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

          So yes, they’re selling your data, and CA law is finally forcing them to admit it, rather than continuing to lie about it.

      • pohart@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        They were selling my data in exactly the way I thought they were.

        I thought they were pretty open about their funding sources and we’re just inaccurate on the description on the privacy policy.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      “It is my conviction that all of this should have been a part of the Thunderbird universe a decade ago," Sipes says. “The absence of web services from us means that our users must make compromises that are often uncomfortable ones. This is how we correct that.”

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          lol, sadly nearly half of Amazon’s income is from AWS; even if its entire marketplace went kaput tomorrow, it’d be fine because so much of the entire Internet depends on it.

          • reddig33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Maybe so. But there’s nothing stopping someone from selling Sears-owned hosting services other than investment. I can see someone like Mark Cuban doing this.

            Amazon is very vulnerable right now because

            • people are boycotting them
            • their website is overrun with fake reviews and cheap junk
            • their products like Alexa are flopping and being canceled
            • they have overextended themselves buy purchasing outfits they don’t need like Whole Foods

            Other retail outfits are flailing like Kohls, Target, and JC Penny for the same reasons.

            All it would take is an online store that stands behind what they sell and doesn’t hide behind an eBay-style reseller system while calling it “retail”.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Desperate for cash and the money from Google might be going away soon because of the antitrust case? Can’t take them on directly in Search; this honestly seems like one of the better ventures for them to go to. Still, 10 years ago would’ve been better and Mozilla squandered some of the goodwill they had in recent years; I’d be a little more reticent about moving my digital presence over now.

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can’t take them on directly in Search

        Give it a few years, google search is already nearly unusable.

        By the way, as a gmail replacement disroot has been great so far. I wonder what the free tier of thundermail will be like, but also worry a little that it might poach donations from smaller, free services.

        • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I used disroot for some time, it’s great; but it still doesn’t have encryption sadly. I think they’re working on it though but you need to manually email your GPG key to them, so they can add it. It took me a couple of weeks to get a reply (understandable, the guy who handles it was busy)

  • Coding4Fun@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    From the same company that “I can take any data that is ‘necessary’ to keep the browser working”. I wouldn’t trust those guys anymore.

    • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Writing this in the context of Google being the alternative is an interesting take (especially when Google hijacks internet standards with things like manifestv3 and has ads in their competing email service)

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well: So far we no nothing about “thundermail”; and mozilla is already struggling with just making firefox good. Why not tuta/posteo/mailbox.org/disroot? Why put all your eggs in one basket? I’m already feeling uneasy with just using firefox.

    • haverholm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      At least Thundermail would be part of a “Thunderbird pro” package, so you would still be free to use Thunderbird with any of the above alternatives. I’d think the opt-in pro service would serve as a revenue stream to keep development going in all products, including the open source mail client.

  • Kissaki@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I scroll down and the page turns black with a text in the middle

    Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information).
    

    well that’s a first for me…