• MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I approve the message! The images are just reinforcement so I don’t really care if it’s AI. Not everyone can draw.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Human artists train using other artists work. Every avenue of human endeavour is based on what came before.

        My own default style shares similarities with Barbara Canepa and Rumiko Takahashi. Why? Because, as a teen, I used to copy their stuff, trying to “unlock” the parts of it that I like.

        If I was to directly copy an image, and say it was my own, then that crosses over into stealing. But that’s not what has happened here. And unless you get very specific with the prompts, it’s not likely to happen.

          • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if I told you that I trained my brain on copyrighted materials that I pirated from the Internet? I make games and I have for sure downloaded games I didn’t pay for and played them. I know I have used some of the mechanics from those games on my own. Am I a bad person?

          • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t agree with your take, sorry.

            To say that an artist should have exclusive control over a style is dangerous.

            Every time there is a big upheaval in an industry, it affects people’s jobs in that sector. Henry Ford’s investments in automation, put a lot of small car manufacturers in a tricky position. It also led to cars being affordable for most American households.

            I’m not unsympathetic, in fact I’m more than a little aware that AI will be taking over my sector, the software development jobs, within a couple of years (and unlike art, I can’t see any market for “hand-crafted” code!).

            But, the genie can’t be put back in the bottle. There’s no possible positive that comes from “calling out” AI art whenever you see it. It doesn’t help artists - if anything we’ve seen artists having to go out of their way proving their work isn’t AI.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, this image isn’t being used commercially so no one is making money off of it. I think that seems like a fair use of AI. Similar to how people make memes with images they stole from the Internet