Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Ypu know what I don’t hear on lemmy? People complaining that crypto world consumes more energy than AI world and one of those is far more useless in grand scheme of things.

    So how comes it is A issue for AI, but everyone seemingly has forgotten about crypto?

    Last I heard, securing one transaction on chain is equalivent to powering US household for many days (feel free to fact check). In comparison, generating LLM text for entire hour on your PC is pretty much the same as gaming for two hours (very approx., your gpu is unlikely at 100% load), which means gaming world is far more destructive energy wise. Are you getting triggered yet?

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Ypu know what I don’t hear on lemmy? People complaining that crypto world consumes more energy than AI world and one of those is far more useless in grand scheme of things.

      I have both heard and said that crypto uses a lot of energy on Lemmy.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ypu know what I don’t hear on lemmy? People complaining that crypto world consumes more energy than AI world and one of those is far more useless in grand scheme of things.

      That’s because one has all the big tech companies madly rushing to implement it everywhere, while the other even Ubisoft has abandoned and is more or less stuck to their own cult

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s not true if you were to use off-chain transactions (i.e. lightning network)

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        “That’s not true”

        “But not true only if you use non-mainstream transaction method that was not part of the original design and is only supported by selected cryptos, meaning not universal”

        K

        I mean, don’t get me wrong, it’s nice that things are improving, but it’s safe to say that things will improve for AI too (energy-wise), hella lot of people now working on optimization and it looks very promising, even by just splitting large models into many smaller ones by topic

        • adr1an@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I just wanted to clarify the confusion that was in my head for a moment after going after the truth and fact checking. If I buy a pizza with Bitcoin and Lightning Network (which is the only one in use at most legal places), it’s not like I’m using 1600 kWh… The original message is misleading in that regard… Practical and concrete reality are different. But theoretical, if that pizza wanted a normal transaction it would use such amount of energy and take days (that’s why they wouldn’t use that)… So… There’s that.

          Anyway, the dichotomy ‘AI or Crypto’ is false. I am not taking sides. But you do you, enjoy.