cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/44641840

Machia voted for Trump, drawn by promises of border control and national security. “We didn’t want drugs or gangbangers,” he said. But what he didn’t expect was losing some of his most dedicated employees to immigration arrests.

“It’s scaring the farming community,” Machia admitted. “We didn’t think they’d come for the people who help us milk cows.”

LOL. Idiots

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    Exploiting how? They were paid employees. Employed by idiots, obviously, but that in itself is not exploitative.

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The most direct way they were exploiting them was employing them and at the same time voting for policy that deports them and those working like them.

      I’d tend to agree with you if it weren’t for the support that farmer is giving Trump. They may have been paying a perfectly livable wage before. Now the Farmers will need to pay a wage that actually encourages locals work those jobs. Working for 12 hours a day would be a minimum of 100,000 for me.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This doesn’t feel like a genuine question, because it’s an open secret that a majority of american restaurants, farms, and construction outfits run on migrant labor at below minimum wage. I personally work in construction in Oregon, and I’m well aware of this, even hundreds of miles from a boarder.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m not American, so other than random articles I see shared on various social media of questionable reputation, I don’t know. So yes, it’s a genuine question.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they’re milking their own cows at 4 A.M. and complaining that there’s no migrants to do the work, then one has to wonder if it’s because they couldn’t hire a citizen at the rates they were paying. If they can’t hire a citizen at the rates they’re paying well…

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        59
        ·
        1 day ago

        …it means that citizens are too far above manual labor. Still doesn’t necessitate exploitation.

        • breecher@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It doesn’t necessarily mean that at all, that is your own personal opinion, not fact. Pay people a decent livable wage and they will perform your manual labour.

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Obviously not. That’s why they can’t hire people that aren’t at risk and exploitable.

              • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                22 hours ago

                This is why they want to fill the tech sector with h1b migrants. If they lose their job, they have a narrow window to find another corporate sponsor, or they get deported. This makes even the well paying, white collar, market exploitable in the same way we exploit migrant labor for farms.

    • Bravo@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “A red is any son-of-a-bitch that wants thirty cents an hour when we’re payin’ twenty-five!”