TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoTIL shitposts can get Wikipedia pages if they're popular enoughen.m.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1115arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1110arrow-down1external-linkTIL shitposts can get Wikipedia pages if they're popular enoughen.m.wikipedia.orgTriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBaron Von J@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·2 months agoAnything can get a Wikipedia page if you can source the info, no?
minus-squarebonn2@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·2 months agoWikipedia does have rules requiring an amount of noteworthyness.
minus-squareTim_Bisley@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 months agoNo I was blocked repeatedly from creating Wikipedia articles about a few different Japanese computing magazines. The mods there said the topic didn’t merit an article.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 months agohow the fuck does a magazine available in stores not merit an article? absolute wankers
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·2 months agoIf you can source the info and pull the stick out of the editors’ asses about notoriety
Anything can get a Wikipedia page if you can source the info, no?
Wikipedia does have rules requiring an amount of noteworthyness.
No I was blocked repeatedly from creating Wikipedia articles about a few different Japanese computing magazines. The mods there said the topic didn’t merit an article.
how the fuck does a magazine available in stores not merit an article? absolute wankers
If you can source the info and pull the stick out of the editors’ asses about notoriety