No more same-sex marriages? Next will be interracial marriages.

Child marriages will still be okay cause pedophiles are protected by Republicans.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    1 day ago

    This case should have been stamped out a very long time ago. Her first amendment rights do not give her the authority to reject a valid marriage application. Refusing to do your job is not protected by any amendment, because it isn’t speech. There is no valid legal argument in defense of her actions.

    The fact that we’re here, still talking about it, and there’s a chance she could be heard by this corrupted supreme court, that tells you where we are as a free nation.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. If you have moral or religious beliefs that will prevent you from doing your job it’s on you to find another.

    • Action Bastard@lemmy.world@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes, but have you considered that the Supreme Court doesn’t care and wants instead to allow religious activists (like themselves) to disregard prior precedent and other religious beliefs in favor of enshrining their own personal beliefs as civil law? It’s really rather unfair of you to not consider their personal beliefs, which says they should be able to impose theirs and ignores yours, y’know.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      To the right wing authoritarian mindset, unless their unwarranted special privileges (of being xtian) are not only centered, but put up on a pedestal, they think they are being “oppressed” and that they don’t have “freedom”.

      The Southern notion of “freedom” and “liberty” involves things like owning others and forcing your own views onto everyone else, with the blessing and the power of the government.

      So we get the idiocy of these people acting like they are the keepers of “liberty”, and “freedom” and say things about being for the Constitution and a “small government” with a straight face, even though all of it is a brazen lie. Forcing other peoples’ kids to pray to their god, use something like the “trump bible” and be denied their right to marry who they please is the exact opposite of freedom.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Funny how this is a religious violation but I’ve never seen a catholic cop suing the government over complicity in someone’s execution

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Imagine if this lady put this much energy into being in a good healthy marriage instead getting married 3 times.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        LMFAO why is it ALWAYS a wild ride with these people

        Davis has been married four times to three husbands

        Her third husband is the biological father of the twins, the children being conceived while Davis was still married to her first husband. The twins were adopted by Davis’s current husband, Joe Davis, who was also her second husband; the couple initially divorced in 2006 but later remarried

        Davis says she experienced a religious awakening in 2011, following her mother-in-law’s dying wish that she attend church.[13] Since then Davis has identified herself as a Christian, belonging to the Apostolic Pentecostal movement,[199] which favors what they describe as a literal interpretation of the Bible.[200] She worships three times a week[201] at the Solid Rock Apostolic Church near Morehead.[13][202] Following her conversion, Davis let her hair grow long, stopped wearing makeup and jewelry, and began wearing skirts and dresses that fall below the knee, in keeping with Apostolic Pentecostal tenets regarding outward holiness and modest dress.[98][202] She also held a weekly Bible study for female inmates at the local jail.[13][202] In an interview in January 2016, Davis said that she believed that “we are living in end times.”[203] Davis also expressed her view that the Bible is infallible.[203]

        these people are simply fucking nutjobs, absolute messes

    • watson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I hear you. Right wing mofo are always suing somebody. Biggest bunch of crybabies I’ve ever seen.

  • xyzzy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    OK, so she was a county clerk who refused to issue a marriage certificate to a same-sex couple and was briefly jailed and fined as a result. Now she’s the vehicle to overturn same-sex marriage because she’s seen as basically the only person who would have standing to bring the issue before the Supreme Court again?

    But how does her case have any bearing on whether or not same-sex marriage should be legal? It’s a separate and unrelated issue. The connection isn’t even tenuous, it just seems nonexistent.

    I really hope the Supreme Court just declines to hear the case. At least Kavanaugh and Barrett don’t seem interested in revisiting the issue.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      When has a conservative ever given you a reason to believe that they are arguing in good faith?

    • nman90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      My guess would be allowing people to refuse marriage certificates based on their biased beliefs, and i don’t think this stops at just same sex either, it probably will extend to race, religion or just that they don’t like you because you were not “nice” to them

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s the oblique route for sure, but could be just as effective in the long run. You wouldn’t have to actually overturn the legal concept of gay marriage, while at the same time being able to prevent gay marriage from happening in the future.

      You just have to empower the position with the power to deny access to a marriage license and then fill those positions with people who don’t think it should exist. With one ruling you could potentially make it legal to deny gay people marriages, deny women the right to a divorce, or whatever insanely bigoted shit religious people dream up.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, it shouldn’t but the Supreme Court is going to jump at any excuse to overturn same-sex marriage. No legal reason, they just want to

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d like some reporter to ask Bessent (on camera) about his own marriage and if it should be nullified by SCOTUS.

  • Nightlight17776@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m so happy to see everyone in agreement here. Lemmy is so much better than reddit. I just gotta learn how to use it all but that’s the fun part

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Urgh, not this asshole again. I thought she had crawled back under her hoarder fundie-Christian bridge a while ago.