I gave you sources, just take the time to read them.
Check out refercence g from the wikipedia page
And last but not least, if historians and scholars overwhelmingly agree that a guy named Jesus existed in Judea during the first century, who am I (but also, who are you) to assert otherwise ?
(Remember that proving the absence of a thing requires some finesse, make sure you have that)
Show me a single piece of evidence that document the existence of Jesus is true, You can’t just point me to a page flooded with multiple false Christian propaganda.
I have read lots and lots of so called “evidence” of which there are 3 pieces claimed to be the major pieces of evidence, and they are all highly unreliable, and considering the alleged importance of Jesus Christ at his time, 3 pieces of faked evidence is way less than what we could reasonably expect, even if they were somewhat trustworthy.
Here’s a link to “the internet” read and lean. https://www.google.com/ /sarcasm on your link that I have already read years ago. What they call evidence is not actually valid historical evidence.
I gave you sources, just take the time to read them. Check out refercence g from the wikipedia page
And last but not least, if historians and scholars overwhelmingly agree that a guy named Jesus existed in Judea during the first century, who am I (but also, who are you) to assert otherwise ?
(Remember that proving the absence of a thing requires some finesse, make sure you have that)
Show me a single piece of evidence that document the existence of Jesus is true, You can’t just point me to a page flooded with multiple false Christian propaganda.
I have read lots and lots of so called “evidence” of which there are 3 pieces claimed to be the major pieces of evidence, and they are all highly unreliable, and considering the alleged importance of Jesus Christ at his time, 3 pieces of faked evidence is way less than what we could reasonably expect, even if they were somewhat trustworthy.
Here’s a link to “the internet” read and lean. https://www.google.com/ /sarcasm on your link that I have already read years ago. What they call evidence is not actually valid historical evidence.