You must log in or register to comment.
This is how I, a developer with 25 years’ experience, still read many software tutorials. And I have a relatively high tolerance for technical detail. Often it seems the person writing the tutorial is in too deep, and they should have got a friend to write it with their help.
🤝🫂
Worst part is when some folks are too smart, and the mirror effect isolates them from normal folks from forming zeitgeist friendships. 😭
I still get slack for contracting plain English. Not even 70 years ago, Americans where contracting even script!
Like, everyone lost intelligence as tools advanced. Why can’t scribes tier transpile my tutorials?
I feel like there is no inbetween for tutorials. They ethier think you have only discovered computers and the internet today or that you know every programing language and have a CS PhD.
Sometimes both in the same article!
They’ll start by explaining what the internet is before descending into a dense conversation about how to use eBPF to do packet filtering and observability - just who is the audience that needs both halves of this?
Here‘s the kicker: some folks don’t even question how cars work, how the lights work, how their microwave works, yet all ot them have tutorials.
Now ask Annie what she thinks I should wear, and watch how those neurons fire up.
I’m aware
it’s satire.
But this a matter of selective bias. Like, who actually reads the tutorials on how to wash your clothes, and sunglasses ftm.Are you seriously complaining about women?
Click the spoiler.
That only made it worse. I’ll add misogynist to your already long tag of bad stuff.
? Are you now DigVicŋ me right now, or are you really incapable of reading satire?
🤞your not “White Awakening”.
I don’t know what you’re talking about, and that link is explains nothing.
Based on your post history, everything you say is how you feel and nothing you say is satire. The tag stays.
What part of selective biasing information are you projecting on me, that washing clothes tutorials is considered “about women”? Or that of fashion?
Hey guys, I’m having trouble with step number 4. Here’s the error:
Error: doodlewhompus error static non-binging 0xdde0826 ()()<<<>>>>[][]{###{##{}%%^#^>>>~]]: No file inserted manifold juncture pocket grinder - You can fix this with a rematch janktown topple matrixHave you tried reversing the polarity?
Oh, that yeah that just kinda happens just ignore it and continue(proceeds to Nuke Germany)
Jeez, RTFM loser. And don’t post again without including a full log, dump and stack trace that I’m not going to tell you how to create, or you’ll be banned. You’ll also be banned if you ask how to make those.
Step 4. Boop!
