Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it’s “her decision to make,” she is a “very, very good politician.”

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been “out on the streets with her” and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. “It’s so incredibly genuine and open.”

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    I appreciate Bernie for being an adult and helping to boost up the people that will be here after him.

    Most every other politician, when they aren’t cramming their unqualified, entitled broodspawn where they don’t belong, is gnawing off limbs trying to make sure they’re entombed with their positions like the pharaohs.

  • JustTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    As inappropriate and watered down as it sounds, I honestly don’t think this country is going to vote in a female president this decade. Race plays a part too, but I honestly think that this country is more sexist than it is racist when it comes to presidential voting. It’s partially a gut feelings, but I think gender played a bigger role than many people think in the 2016 and 2024 elections. As messed up as it sounds, I think Bernie POTUS with AOC VP would stand a better chance of winning right now as opposed to the other way around. Even with all of the socialist/communist boogie-man bullshit that Bernie gets thrown at him.

  • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t think she has what it takes to come back from where you’ve gone. The next democratic president will have to match or exceed the current regime change policy and be able to ignore laws and norms and gerrymander to get enough power to do anything. Dems have nobody cutthroat enough to do these things.

  • rothaine@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m a big fan of AOC, but I think I’d rather her wait until 2032. The next presidency (if there even is one) is going to be a fucking shitshow trying to clean up Trump’s messes. I’d rather her get the opportunity to be a “get shit done” President, instead of having to spend all her time rooting out Trump’s traitors in the government while getting villainized in the media.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I mean how many times do we have to learn the hard way that America won’t elect a woman to be president?

    Look at this country.

    It’s a shitshow.

    It didn’t elect a woman when the other option was a felon, rapist, insurrectionist manchild with one failed presidency and two impeachments already under his belt.

    Do we really want to do this again when the stakes are so unbelievably high?

    Goddamn. People need to get their heads screwed on straight. She isn’t just a woman, she’s also profoundly hated by a lot of Americans for being so progressive. Why the fuck would we do this to ourselves? I mean America wouldn’t even elect Bernie, the male version of her with a lot more experience.

    WE NEED TO START LIVING IN REALITY.

    I like AOC. I respect her for what she does. But she’s not going to be president in 2028.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I hate that my thoughts on this need to waffle between:

    (A) who do I think would be the best president, and

    (B) who do I think has the most strategic chance of beating the GOP puppet candidate.

  • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you even get to 2028, good luck.

    Harris was just Biden extended and I think the lack of voter turnout amongst democrats despite the stakes showed what a big disadvantage being a woman is.

    The fact 2016 popular vote was close was crazy, but then you have a (half) black woman?

    I dunno.

    She’s one of the best already in the system, but she’s nowhere as quick quitted or ready on her feet as Mamdani, and more than that, unless they get the house and a super majority in the senate, it’s going to be very hard for her to promise things that will actually come true.

    All of that of course has the background where the US might very well not have a 2028 election, especially if they don’t have a massive change in power in the 2026 mid terms.

    I would love it. I would love a coloured woman in the top position as a direct pendulum swing back from Trump, but I am also pragmatic and I’m not sure the racism wouldn’t win over actually having a more progressive platform.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Look at this point you could literally run George Washington himself as a Democrat and MAGA wouldn’t vote for him.

    Also, compared to the current guy, a rancid portion of tuberculotic lung coughed up in a pool of fetid blood on the floor of some 18th century eastern European sanitarium is a “very good politician”.

  • Prizefighter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I saw this coming a mile away and I hope she does win the Presidential Election to break barriers and to end the nonsense going on currently.

    Problem is the conservatives will argue/debate no woman should be in power followed by countless historical references to prove their point. Then someone will show even more historical references of conservatives causing twice to three times the issues. This will turn into one giant circle jerk of why they (conservative) won’t listen to a woman when they don’t even listen to their own parents.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The greater risk isn’t misogynist republicans IMO, it’s misogynist liberals who will cynically use her gender and ethnic background as examples of her unelectability instead of addressing their opposition to her populist agenda.

      I don’t take issue wither her being a woman, but dumb rural americans will, so we can’t nominate her”

      Every time a populist candidate gains momentum in the democratic party, democrats suddenly become greatly concerned about electability. See: Obama, Sanders, Mamdani, Fatah, ect.

      Maybe if democrats placed as much emphasis on a popular policy agenda as they do on identity, they wouldn’t have as much of an electability problem.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The greater risk isn’t misogynist republicans IMO, it’s misogynist liberals who will cynically use her gender and ethnic background as examples of her unelectability instead of addressing their opposition to her populist agenda.

        Spot on.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was wild seeing the libs blame lower turnout among black people for Hillary’s loss.

        At no point did they question what policies lowered turnout, or address that white people, including women, voted Trump.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yep. I would love AOC to win but there’s no chance in America for that to happen. Our populace is deranged.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The people who would especially hate her would never vote for a non-republican anyway so ya’ll just need to get over it and just go for all-in.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Utterly boring “safe” candidates on the supposed left is how we got here in the first place. Give me a straight-up Marxist, just not with that messaging. And who would they be running against, Vance? Ha

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Third female candidate in four election cycles. I dunno, feels like we are asking to lose. And again, I would love to vote for her. Just don’t think the populace can muster it. I have lost all faith in Americans. The hope from Obama’s terms is completely gone.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The fun thing about intersectionality is that you could also look at her as the first latina candidate

            But looking at what her politics are is somehow never the consideration. In terms of platform, she could hardly be more distinct from either Clinton or Kamala. I like the odds of popular socialist policies much, much better than focus-group tested middling capitalist policies.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Hillary won the popular vote and still lost in a system where the popular vote doesn’t matter. We have a rigged system. I voted for Hillary. It’s not that I don’t have faith in our candidates. I don’t have faith in the system and my fellow Americans.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Seriously. A bland corporate candidate who gave the opposition two decades of lead time to build up an opposition strategy. One of the worst candidates to have run of all time.

      • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        She’d face the exact same misogyny that Harris did, the difference though would be she’d have a strong enthusiastic volunteer base behind her. I think if the election is fair she’d have very good odds.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          We tried Clinton. We tried Harris. I know the conditions are different, but do we really want to risk it when abject fascism is the consequence?

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Running a milqtoast centrist is just fascism with extra steps. They will do nothing of substance and then people will vote for fascists to enact change.

          • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I think having an authentic populist voice is more important than any race or gender considerations. We simply don’t have another candidate that can do this as credibly as AOC. I think if she runs, in the primary, she’ll handily beat out Newsom, Pritzker or any other white guys in the party who are in a position to run.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Yes!? Clinton was the worst possible candidate for that election and Harris just isn’t a good politician and was utterly sabotaged from Biden among other things waiting waaaaay too long to drop out.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like AOC and agree with her on a lot. And I really would like to see how she would handle it. But as a straight white guy in his 40’s that honestly wants to see things get better for everyone I also dread the tidal wave of dog whistle reasons the GOP will bring out for why she is unfit.

    I know that is the point, but the constant avalanche of ignorant talking points that hearken back to “the good ole days” when men were men, women were arm candy, and brown people shared a corner on the floor with the family dog in these peoples minds that they disguise as honest engagement with a legitimate issue in the country is starting to burn me out.