• jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      There actually was something in the article that surprised me:

      The analysts also said consumers have paid for about 50% to 70% of the total tariff cost to date.

      I was shocked it wasn’t 100% to 120%. The fact that any businesses are shouldering even a portion of the tariffs is incredible. I fully expected them to go “Oh tariff is 50%? Better charge the consumer 60% just so we get our cut.”

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        Theres a game of chicken going on. Try to hold out until the illegal tariffs are refunded so you dont lose customers.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Don’t forget classic market pressure. Consumers were already struggling, if your product goes up too much many simply can’t buy it

        • snooggums@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yup, and if they are rescinded the companies get to double dip as they get the tariffs back and don’t have to share the refund with customers.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wonder if it is by item or by dollar value. I imagine smaller businesses are often more likely to shoulder the burder of the tariff than larger, because they are more reliant on customer satisfaction. I’m talking out of my ass, though