• harmsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Technically, physics does allow a satellite-based method to deal with climate change. Economics, on the other hand, does not. You would need to chuck an unfathomable amount of mass into orbit.

      • shane@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Do you though? I mean, a satellite orbiting the sun between the earth and the sun could cast a large shadow, right?

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          That’s… Not how shadows work… Or orbital mechanics… Or economics…

          His suggestion, impossible as it is at the current stage of human development, is slightly less impossible than this.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s why. He must have some weird misunderstanding to think it’s actually doable.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      More interestingly, if he truly announced that idea, he’d have to be admitting climate change is real in the first place.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      psst… “climate”… and pray tell, which energy source do you think powers the atmosphere to exhibit weather or climate?

      Geothermal? Tidal? Nuclear isotope decay in the core?