The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoDon't rely on it for anything important media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1755arrow-down115
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageDon't rely on it for anything important media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-squarewizblizz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 day agoSounds more actively harmful than useful to me.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoWhen it works it can save time automating annoying tasks. The problem is “when it works”. It’s like having to do code reviews mid work every time the dumb machine does something.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 day agoSo it causes more harm or loss than benefit. So it’s not useful. “When it works” it creates the need for oversight because “when it doesn’t work” it creates massive liabilities.
minus-squarecriss_cross@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoI’m not disagreeing lol. I bring it up to explain why losers are obsessed with it.
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIf you would say the same for stack overflow and Google, then sure. Otherwise, absolutely not.
Sounds more actively harmful than useful to me.
When it works it can save time automating annoying tasks.
The problem is “when it works”. It’s like having to do code reviews mid work every time the dumb machine does something.
So it causes more harm or loss than benefit. So it’s not useful.
“When it works” it creates the need for oversight because “when it doesn’t work” it creates massive liabilities.
I’m not disagreeing lol.
I bring it up to explain why losers are obsessed with it.
If you would say the same for stack overflow and Google, then sure.
Otherwise, absolutely not.