• Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If you mean the 34 felonies, that judge effectively said his punishment would be nothing. Which is very fun by the way - when has a non rich person gotten to shrug off dozens of felony convictions? He was never charged, as far as I’m aware, in connection to the coup attempt.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Impeachments without a result are also convictions without consequences. If anything they showed him he could do whatever he wanted, so he has.

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Gonna get real pedantic here. It’s passé that “impeachment” is the part the House of Representatives does, then the Senate gets their vote. If 2/3 of the Senage agree the person did the bad, this means they are “convicted” by the Senate which automatically leads to removal from office. So, a conviction in reference to the broader “impeachment” process comes with very real consequences, by definition.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yes, you’re right, an acquittal does mean not convicted. Even when the general attitude among the Republicans wasn’t that the impeachment findings were wrong, just that it wasn’t a big deal to them (mainly concerning the first time, but I guess also the second since storming the Capitol wasn’t enough to change their mind). So again the message was sent that he had free reign.