Shortly after a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday, city leaders began looking into whether the officer had violated state criminal law.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said, “We collectively are going to do everything possible to get to the bottom of this, to get justice, and to make sure that there is an investigation that is conducted in full.” Police Chief Brian O’Hara followed up by saying that the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension is “investigat[ing] whether any state laws within the state of Minnesota have been violated.”

If they conclude that state law has been violated, the question is: What next? Contrary to recent assertions from some federal officials, states can prosecute federal officers for violating state criminal laws, and there is precedent for that.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That may not have been enough, given that in incidents like George Floyd, public video postings were some of the most critical evidence. Everyone has that evidence, even if they cannot provide on-scene confirmations.

    • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That doesn’t exactly work in the murderers favour, considering now the only evidence is various videos of him doing the murder in a non-threatening situation.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Also jury nullification. Doesn’t matter if the verdict the jury delivers is guilty or innocent, so long as the jury says one thing and thinks another it’s jury nullification.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            About as organized as one, but by the very definition the violence done by and on order of the government can’t be one.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ehh kind of. But, you know, nullification is when the laws say they’re guilty but the jury says no. Typically because the laws are unjust. But there’s an opposite where the laws might say they’re innocent, but the jury says guilty because the laws are also unjust.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, still sounds like mob justice. Not disagreeing with the mob in this case mind you.

            • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yeah, true. Too much jury nullification of any sort means you’re systems are failing. Not good for a society.