Lemmy: Bestiverse
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months ago

MIT builds swarms of tiny robotic insect drones that can fly 100 times longer than previous designs

www.livescience.com

external-link
message-square
61
fedilink
190
external-link

MIT builds swarms of tiny robotic insect drones that can fly 100 times longer than previous designs

www.livescience.com

floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months ago
message-square
61
fedilink
Scientists have built a new type of robotic insect that can fly 100 times longer than previous generations.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • double_quack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 months ago

    We all know where this is gonna end…

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      3 months ago

      Surveillance drones everywhere.

      • double_quack@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        3 months ago

        Surveillance is the “nice” version of it.

        • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          3 months ago

          Anal probes everywhere.

          • double_quack@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Exactly! Flying, they are flying everywheeeaaahhhh!

            • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              • adarza@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                3 months ago

                DilDrone™

                • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yeah I was gonna say like why are we even workshopping the name with a winner like that. Get this employee a bonus check!

              • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Neat a dildo and 4 rotating nipple toys

              • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                https://abq.news/2022/03/sex-toy-drone-operator-who-terrorized-sheriff-manny-gonzales-mayoral-campaign-runs-for-sheriff/

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve low-key started to think the only reason we haven’t seen autonomous hunter-killer drones yet is that nobody’s willing to break the seal, and I’m scared for what happens when somebody finally does.

      • double_quack@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        My dear stranger, those already exist, and have been used in war to terminate key individuals.

        We are living the dream.

        • metaStatic@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          key individuals

          Such as Palestinian children

        • Thrashy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Point me towards systems that don’t have a human in the loop, particularly any that utilize fully-autonomous swarms, and I’ll agree. Scary as the former are, there’s a world of difference between a handful of FPV suicide drones, and a cloud of HL2-Manhack-esque things operating on face-recogniton-guided autopilot.

          • double_quack@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, that’s what you mean… yeah, there are humans behind, but potato potato, swap one brain for another… anyway it is a killing machine that can get you anywhere in the planet.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The humans are using ai to pick the targets they kill anyway. They theoretically are supposed to parse out the bad targets, but we know from examples listed in the above, that for genocidal states like Israel, that review is intentionally ignored or minimized.

      • Erasmus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Horizon Zero Dawn looking more eminent any day now.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are definitely super willing to break the seal, just nobody has built a good target ID system yet that won’t fire on civilians.

        If you just need everyone in a 10 mile radius dead, you could send in the hunter bots, or you could just shell the area with heavy artillery from three countries away. We already have that problem solved. Once we have a reliable target ID system I guarantee you’ll start seeing unmanned equipment in war.

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anal

    • Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      #BugsArentReal

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And it sucks, when you think inside Star Wars, such small drones are used only in medical or expensive surveillance and military applications.

      But in real life it can really be a swarm of things worse than scarabs in The Mummy.

    • Docus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is no way these things could spread poison instead of pollen is there?

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In the latest video about this by veritasium, he asked the researcher about ethics concern. the researcher insist that they dont care as humanity can decide for itself.

    Meanwhile:

    The new report also details the extent of MIT’s partnerships with Israeli military contractors like Elbit Systems, which supplies 85 percent of Israel’s killer drones, and Maersk, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, that has sent millions of pounds of military goods to Israel since the start of the war on Gaza. The Israeli military also sponsored several of the MIT projects with funds provided by the U.S. Defense Department.

    https://theintercept.com/2025/01/16/mit-israel-military-funding-research-gaza/

    • shoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      That researcher is a real life Dr. Hoenikker. Vonnegut is probably shrugging in his grave

      • Sam, The Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        -…his mother was completely consumed by robotic bees. So it goes.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

    • remer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “We are willing to ignore and downplay the ethical concerns as long as the money keeping coming in”

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d rather just have bees.

    • ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      But how can techbros get rich from bees? Bees just make themselves for free then serve the greater good, the little buzzing communists.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even birds are starting to seem acceptable

      • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        oh so you think birds aren’t already flying robots? robot bees are just the next step.

        /s obviously

    • MonkeyTown@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d rather not have robot bees. I’ve seen hated in the nation (black mirror episode).

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The MIT engineers agree. They said something to the effect of “If you could make a robotic bee, it wouldn’t replace bees. It would be a terrible idea to try to use them for pollination… Just put that same amount of finding into conservation and researching bees, you would have a much better result.”

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    The new technology could increase crop yields dramatically without harming the environment.

    That’s a surprisingly benign use case, I was expecting far worse.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plot twist: The crop is human misery.

      • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well then fucking harvest me and get it over with

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      The public use case.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Humans are the crops.

      • double_quack@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        *corps

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          *corpses

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          *corpses

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          *corpses

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Without a doubt they will have those other use cases in mind too. Mentioning them is just not good for marketing in public.

    • AJ1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guess I’m the only one thinking about how it’s inevitable that birds and other animals will mistake them for real insects and die from ingesting these things, god knows what kind of toxic materials they’re made of but I’m willing to bet it’s not safe to eat them

  • PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      They think there will be more profit in it, especially since bees can’t be repurposed as weapons.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        bees can’t be repurposed as weapons.

        Capitalism will find a way.

        https://cherwell.org/2024/10/18/oxford-scientists-microchip-bees-with-smallest-radar-ever/

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dear technology under capitalism… We just want healthcare, housing, etc… We don’t fucking need swarms of robot insects.

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just today I was watching this video:

      How we came to hate technology

  • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve seen this episode of Black Mirror.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Fall into me

      And drown inside me

      I know you will see

      The beauty of me

      Also, I’ve seen this episode of Tom Scott.

  • Someplaceunknown@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope, I’m out

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    It wont be long now before the nanobots exist and the Borg can finally take over. Resistance is futile.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      the Borg

      Sounds like communism…

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    How’s this for an obscure reference? This reminded me of an episode of Max Headroom in which the wunderkind Bryce invented a robotic fly with a spycam that could be used to literally bug a room. They send it on a mission to uncover an evil plot and everyone is excitedly crowded around the screen and heaping praise on it. Then it manages to sneak into the evil lair where it promptly gets swatted, leaving Bryce shocked and devastated.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      They also did this in Spy Kids

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Looks like they hovered for 1000 seconds. It was previously stress limited such that the joints would break after just a few seconds. I think they might still be tethered for a power source, I haven’t seen any of these micro flapping bots include a battery yet, and they didn’t mention that they did.

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adp4256

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bradbury called it in Farahenheit 451.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Canada might need these sooner rather than later.

    With the breakdown of democracy and the rule of law in America, the Constitution just became wholly unenforceable and therefore irrelevant. That means that Trump could make good on his fever dream of invading Canada.

    And there are many Americans who would jump at the chance to obey his command to slaughter Canadians. With only 40M against America’s 334M - and 0.097M military personnel against America’s 2.1M - it would be absolutely no contest.

    Our only way of making such a fascist act of aggression as painful as possible would be with asymmetrical warfare using tiny, hard-to-defeat drones that could act independently and strike without warning. Deploy 10k of these suckers onto a battlefield, and the only survivors would be those within sealed armour or flying at high altitude. Because even an A10 Warthog loitering low over the field can be taken out if it unexpectedly ingests a half-dozen of the explosive buggers.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think there was an X-Files episode about this.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.94K users / day
  • 9.67K users / week
  • 17.8K users / month
  • 37K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 69.8K subscribers
  • 5.93K Posts
  • 177K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org