In the wake of the U.S. airstrikes on Iran, Democrats are pointing to Trump’s own promises that he wouldn’t ensnare the country in foreign conflicts.

Democrats are seizing on Donald Trump’s surprise attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities to make the case that the world is becoming more dangerous on his watch, not less, and that he is reneging on a promise to avoid foreign military interventions.

The argument strikes at Trump’s contention that his blend of negotiating skills and toughness is enough to keep the United States safe.

In the space of a few days, Trump has made the United States a combatant in another Middle East war that exposes soldiers to potential deadly reprisals, Democrats contend.

In a statement, Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin pointed to Trump’s inaugural address, in which he said he would measure his success by “the wars we never get into.”

  • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    She might have had a chance, but at every turn she chose to say she would be no different from Biden. The fundamental reality is that people are disgusted by the status quo and don’t show up for those that say nothing will change.

    • arrow74@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I still swallowed my pride and voted for her anyway, but I’ve never been so insulted as when I heard the “greatest economy ever” line over and over.

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was great, just not for the regular working people that normal economic barometer’s used by governments ignore.

        • arrow74@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s exactly why it was insulting. It’s basically saying “I’m sorry you can’t afford a house, but the stock market is great!”

        • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Tell yourself that all you want buddy. I wish I hadn’t voted for her, it was stupid voting for someone who clearly gives no shits about fighting fascism or preventing genocide, and I won’t be voting for blue presidents ever again bc they’re only going to get further and further right

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Because it makes so much more sense to abstain from voting so now your vote is for fascism as opposed to picking the non-fascist.

            It’s peak denial of reality

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              “as opposed to picking the non-fascist” Liberals are fascists. They have done nothing at all to oppose trump. When they stop siding with fascists over progressives literally every single time, maybe you’ll have something remotely resembling a point

              When there’s 9 people at a table and a fascist sits, etc etc

              • arrow74@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Liberals I’d say are to the immediate left of fascism. They definently enable policies that allow fascists to exist. While never taking that power themselves.

                What people like you seem to forget is that our voting system is fundamentally broken and flawed. It limits our voice so short of a revolution we have to pick damage contol.

                Funnily enough the only people that have tried to fix it are the democrats. Plenty of states under democratic control have pushed for a popular vote for president. It’s not going to fix the voting system, but it would be a big improvement and then you would actually have a significantly better chance to get a third party canidate elected. Then you would have a point.

                • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I’m cool with fighting for some things liberals also fight for, especially those kinda of voting reforms, bc along with ensuring conservatives lose every election, i bet it’d force liberals to actually appeal to the left to not risk losing to real progressives. Sadly they’ll prob stop supporting that the moment it actually threatens to change the status quo at all

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR

              QUIT EXCUSING YOUR UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR LIBERALS

              Just say you love killing gazans and getting fascists into office, there’s no other explanation for thinking democrats are even remotely decent

              • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                REPUBLICAN VOTERS ALWAYS VOTE REPUBLICAN. So if you want to split the liberal vote, you guarantee a Republican victory, because the ONLY FUCKING PEOPLE that will vote for this mythical 3rd option IS THE FUCKING LIBERALS.

              • arrow74@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                All caps doesn’t make you right buddy. I hate it, but until we can reform our fundamentally flawed system there are two options. Especially for president. If you split a state to a progressive canidate you almost garuntee a Fascist/Republican victory. The system itself is flawed. I’m sorry it’s a harsh reality to accept. I was like you once. I made this very mistake back in 2016, and I vowed to never be such a fool again.

                Don’t chose fascism friend.

                Just say you love killing gazans

                Save the weak and overdone character attacks. The apartheid state of Israel has no right to exist. Unfortunately that wasn’t on my ballot and no torching my vote didn’t put it on the ballot either.

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So what have you done in the previous nine years to reform the voting system?

        • arrow74@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 days ago

          The economy was/is abysmal for the average American. School is unaffordable, housing is unaffordable, and food is becoming increasingly unaffordable.

          When they were saying the economy was good, they were saying stocks were up. Which mostly benefits the wealthiest.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      don’t show up

      They did show up. Kamala Harris won more votes than Barack Obama.

      People talk like the Democrats didn’t successfully twist arms and browbeat supporters into showing up for them in droves. 75,017,613 people voted for Kamala Harris, despite her vile stench.

      Trump simply brought in more.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You were correct until the last sentence.

        HitlerPig cheated, and we all know it. Cheating is their brand. They would cheat even if they KNEW they were going to win.

        Dems went right to the “fair & square” line IMMEDIATELY after the election without even taking the slightest look at the evidence.

        Now we are finding evidence in many places of very weird results, and the Dems are still trying to sell the concept of voters who voted a straight Democratic ticket, except HitlerPig at the top. I’m sure there are a few, but they are as rare as white squirrels. I’ve never met one, and I’ve never seen anyone claim to be one in the media, either. If there are so many of them that it SWUNG THE ELECTION, then let’s talk to these people. Where are they?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          HitlerPig cheated, and we all know it.

          Nixon accused JFK of buying votes all through Illinois after the 1960 election. And we have ample statistical and anecdotal evidence to suggest the Dem machine in Chicago was absolutely stacking the deck in JFK’s favor. But we also have ample statistical and anecdotal evidence to suggest the GOP machine was stacking the deck in the south of the state.

          Subsequently, when Nixon recaptured the executive branch in '68 (following a series of very convenient political upheavals) he implemented the “Southern Strategy” to win over Dixiecrat leadership and cement a Republican majority across the Gulf Coast for the next 80 years. The same Democrats who had been winning elections on the back of that machine in the 60s/70s became Republicans winning with the same machine at their backs in the 80s/90s.

          This isn’t a problem unique to Trump. It’s baked into the decentralized, county-lead, deliberately opaque and byzantine electoral counting and reporting system. Katherine Harris was fucking with Florida elections in 2000 the same way Brad Raffensperger fucked with Georgia elections in 2024.

          And don’t look too hard at California’s ascendancy of Silicon Valley shills or the cop-lead effort to elevate Eric Adams to the NYC Mayorship or the Richie Torries seat in the Bronx or the current ratfvckery with Cuomo.

      • dinren@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is that part about the voting machines and how certain districts got literally 100% Trump votes, which is… pretty impossible.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s the “machines are rigged” explanation, which I’ve been torn on.

          But there’s also the far more likely “the city officials simply don’t let you in if they think you’re not going to vote for Trump” which I find much more believable.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Watch HBO’s documentary Hacking Democracy, and then realize that Republicans, Sociopathic Oligarchs, Russia, China, North Korea, and others, have been operating sophisticated hacking programs ever since. You won’t be torn anymore.

            To believe that extremely powerful forces have NOT been trying to control our elections for years, is extremely naive.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              You won’t be torn anymore.

              I’ve seen bits of it and heard some of the highnotes covered in other media. I think one of the producers was on the TrashFuture podcast at one point… or another one I listen to.

              Either way, the Russia/China/North Korea/Insert-Evil-Foreigner-Here (but never Israel or Saudi Arabia or Qatar, because we’re friends and they would never dream of…) angle was overhyped, while the degree to which local county clerks and judges fuck with this was under reported.

              To believe that extremely powerful forces have NOT been trying to control our elections for years, is extremely naive.

              Election manipulation, particularly domestically, is a very touchy subject. It’s been proven to depress voter turnout in the receptive demographic. So you’re stuck with this dilemma of trying to alert people to manipulation without deterring them from turning out in the next cycle. The line that both liberals and conservatives throw out is “We have to vote in such huge numbers that they can’t cheat us!” which can be an effective rallying cry in the moment. But it doesn’t work if you don’t ever do anything to address the claims down the line.

              Even when Obama’s campaign swept the Atlantic Coast in 2008, what did his DOJ do to confront all the Bush-era fuckery thereafter? Same with Trump in 2016, screaming “Lock her up!” at Hillary while insisting she’s rigged the whole vote, then… just shrugging and ignoring her while in office. Really kicks the legs out of your base when you spend a year complaining about how inherently unfair the election process has become and then announcing “We won so I guess everything is fine”.

    • distantsounds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree 100%. She would have been better in that she’s coherent, but just another neolib failing to address systemic problems.

      • dinren@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        We would have been able to focus on international issues and not worrying about the entire country crashing down around us like some handmaids tale nightmare.