• Macallan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Thankfully I have a tankless water heater and don’t need to deal with this anymore.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If you have a tank already that would reduce the costs of upgrading to a heat pump. All of my heating is through the heat pump and now heating is like 1/3rd of my total electricity bill.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve switched from similiar-sized apartment with a tank heater to a house with a tankless heater. My bills are close enough that it isn’t super easy to tell. total it was about 20-40 more a month for the location switch.

        The real difference is how often you use it. You’ll save money if you use it sparingly (as opposed to an always on tank heater), but you’ll definitely spend more if you don’t (because infinite hot water access!). Just make sure it and it’s power source is sized for the house it’s going into.

        You’ll definitely want to pay for an electrician to get it on a dedicated circuit to power it. Otherwise you’ll just get infinite tepid water instead.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I’ve talked to many plumbers about this and what I’ve learned is that if you don’t have gas, it won’t be as good (on average). New construction with dedicated power is a different story, but retrofits are often limited to whatever the old water heater was using, which by definition isn’t enough. Running new power is likely to be a headache.

        • ViperActual@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Now that you’ve mentioned it, I’ve never considered tankless water heaters being gas powered also as an option. My house is all electric so I only have that variable to deal with.

          • thetrekkersparky@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’m an electrician. I haven’t been impressed by most of the tankless systems I’ve hooked up. I would definitely go with gas unless you are willing to run some serious power. Most hot water tanks pull about 3000-4500W or 12.5-18.75A at 240V. A good tankless system is upwards of 18000W or 75A at 240V and some can be around 36000W which works out to 150A. This will easily be the single largest electrical load in your house, unless you also have an electric furnace or something. Depending the size of your electrical service and what else you have in your house you may need to upgrade the electrical service going to your house as well. Most Residential Electrical services are usually 100-200A in my area.

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That is a lot of power… Surely with that much power you could afford a heat pump instead

            • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Edit: my bad, I was wrong. My unit is actually not using a regular plug, and pulls up to 21kW.

              I mean I know things are different here in Europe but 18kW for a water heater? Why? I have one that plugs into a regular outlet, so no more than 3.5kW, and I have no issues whatsoever. Sure, water isn’t boiling hot out of the tap, but I can take showers no problem and usually need to mix a little cold water to make it comfortable. Why would you need any hotter water? Or is there some other reason why you need so much more power in an american system?

              • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                For the shower you’ll want the 18 kW, otherwise you’d have to shower with a tiny stream of water. What you have is meant for washing your hands (tiny one under the sink).

              • Krelis_@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                The 3.5 kW heater will have a tank reservoir that will have time to heat up the water when it’s not being used. Tankless means it has to be heated instantly.

                It takes ~ 4 kJ to heat 1 kg of water for each 1°C. If you want to do that in 1 second, you need 4 kW of heating power.

                So if a shower uses, say, 9 litres per minute, i.e. 0.15 litres per second, heating that water from 10°C (typical cold water temperature) to 40°C (comfortable shower temperature) is:

                4 • 0.15 • 30 = 18 kW
                

                Anything less heats less water per second, or to a lower temperature.

                Like this 5.1 l/min unit at 9.5 kW will be able to heat that flowrate ~28°C above its inlet temperature.

                • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Oops, my bad, I really thought it used a regular 240v plug. Turns out its hooked into my kitchen’s high voltage (400v) circuit and uses 21kW.

                  Thanks for explaining why physically my assumption could not be possible.