• termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    But why !? Chatbots are useful enough, I don’t need AI anywhere else than when I explicitly choose to use it on my terms !

    You wanna make money ? Make a chatbot that lies less and/or doesn’t reinforce people into their delusions, or one that runs for cheaper, or both.

    AI is useful. Just like knives are useful. Doesn’t mean I want every object I own to also somehow be or contain multiple knives 😅

    More often than not, a faster horse is actually all we need.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Hey tech companies. Consumers do not want more AI, they want less of it. Maybe we just need to get the word out?

  • titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hahaha fuck Firefox. Been saying it for years. Used to be the goat. Hasn’t been for a decade and a half.

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    how would this afffect the forked versions like Waterfox, LibreWolf, IronFox? The AI part is a separated feature from mainline Firefox branch, so forks can choose not to include it?

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    19 hours ago

    First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it.

    That’s a good idea to put first. Of course, like do no evil, priorities change, so we’ll need to keep a close eye on this.

    Second: our business model must align with trust. We will grow through transparent monetization that people recognize and value.

    Transparent is good, but if he things he’s going to add value to monetization, he’s smoking crack. There’s nothing we want from a browser that’s not already provided by a plugin.

    Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

    Nobody wants that. We already had all we wanted from them in trusted software.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t know if that is the reason but I wonder if the recent ruling that made Firefox loose on the cash income from Google as a default search engine has them doing a similar type of deal with AI companies, even Google, like, Firefox has a built-in interface for AI and the backend you can choose but the default one is one that some AI company pay a fee to be.

      If that is the case I think it is fine, it is like a wink-wink situation, you have to have it enabled by default and with a default provider for it to be worth something for someone to pay for the privilege, and then the users can simply change it be gone with it without affecting the payout. (Unless the pay or renew pay has some metric like use statistics)

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Librewolf doesn’t actually have their own browser. They provide Firefox with a slightly modified configuration. Your comment is like saying we should give our money to door dash instead of $burger-joint despite door dash having no kitchens no equipment no beef and no cooks.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            $burger-joint should have thought about that before making Door Dash the only usable ordering method, cramming AI into their lobby.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I think I actually nailed that response, the only way you could see it as lacking is if you were trying to forcefully inject preconceived notions like “local joint good, door dash bad” into a situation where the “local joint” is a corporate entity shilling AI and “door dash” as an open source community project.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            They can do that because Firefox is open source. If Mozilla disappeared and funding was sent to one of the forks instead, they could hire more developers and maintain it directly. Maybe even hire some of Mozilla’s best engineers.

            • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              There is no reason to believe that librewolf could ever ever ever replace Mozilla. They have no revenue stream and everything that could get them a revenue stream would make you dislike them as much as you do Mozilla. This is a complete and utter fantasy.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I like to imagine that these CEOs just get like a million AI emails a day from alt accounts of Sam Altman begging them to put AI in everything and they’re all too stupud to realize it.