• LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a heads up, Librewolf last I checked had issues with media involving DRM. Ergo, streaming services will throw a fit if you try using them on it. Not an issue if you don’t use any of course, and there may be ways around it, but worth knowing that it doesn’t work out of the box at least.

    • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, you have to enable a setting. I think it links you to it when you run into it. Much more of a turn off to me is not being able to use my camera in it, so I have to use a different browser for video calls.

  • mmmac@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Last I used librewolf/waterfox they lagged behind a few days on security updates, so I switched to regular Firefox with arkenfox user.js

  • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I was ignoring everything Waterfox back when I realize they were bought by an advertising company, System1, which also owns StartPage.

    BUT, I recently read from Wikipedia that Waterfox has gone independent again since 2023.

  • djvinniev77@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Really hate how iOS has zero alternatives. Thanks apple for your stupid WebKit.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        Yeah but the problem with iOS is that all browsers must use the Safari rendering engine under the hood (except in the EU, but not many developers create a browser for just the EU)

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Could be worse, seriously. Safari is not a bad browser and WebKit is the only engine since years that can keep up with chromium. I get that it is annoying to have leas freedom on iOS, but I also appreciate the increased security[1] and quality of life that comes with it.

      [1] yes, I am aware that open source software tends to be more secure, as it can be reviewed by all. However, Android by default is way less secure than iOS, unless you use GraphiteOS or similar.

    • nil@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I bought an old Pixel 7a with (new) case for less than $179 USD and put Graphene OS on it. Definitely cheaper than buying youself a new iPhone, and installation is easy af.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      There are some good iOS browsers.

      At the moment, I use Orion (from Kagi) and Narrow32. Quiche Browser is good, DuckDuckGo is fine.

      Discoverability on iOS is awful though. The store is just packed with SEO spam and corporate slop on top of all the passion projects or “benevolent” ones.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        At the moment, iOS doesn’t not allow any other browser engines. Every browser on iOS is just reskinned Safari.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          That’s kind of a blessing in disguise; otherwise basically all web traffic would be Chrome.

          Apparenty this is softening some: https://www.techspot.com/news/108965-japan-gives-apple-december-deadline-drop-ios-browser.html

          And Safari is quite performant on iOS.

          Maybe I’m too cynical, but I wouldn’t mind if that continues, just so there’s some chunk of traffic that isn’t Chrome and that web development doesn’t turn into a complete monoculture. A smidge of Firefox and Safari alone isn’t enough for that.

          (EDIT: My assumption is that if Apple allows Chrome on iOS, you can bet they are going to funnel basically everyone into it).

          • pirateKaiser@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That traffic only skews the graph like a false positive. While WebKit itself is oss, apple’s tendency to just separate itself from the rest of the world makes it largely irrelevant. There are very few alternative browsers based on webkit for other platforms and the expected benefit of developers having to cater to apple’s choices are thus negligible for the rest of us.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Still. I don’t want to be on an internet where Chrome is basically the only develoment target, and for most sites to work properly you have to be on Google’s browser. Safari’s mere existance forces at least some generalization, but that disappears if Google pushes most of those users to Chrome anyway.

              That’s the internet where Google has even more total control.

              • pirateKaiser@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I agree, my point is that safari’s dominance on iOS is not the light at the end of the tunnel, it does very little to offer alternatives to chromium.

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Does librewolf or water fox have a mobile version that syncs tabs to desktop like official Firefox ?

    • sunth1ef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      All Geckos can sync if Mozilla Sync is enabled with an account. So you can sync say LibreWokf or WarwrFox on desktop to any mobile version, such as IronFoz. They do not have to “match”.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Oh cool, I didn’t know that and it was the main fear I had from swapping. I really should have just looked it up by now, but oh well.

        • Artaca@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I use Librewolf on my work and personal desktops, then Waterfox on my Android. I prefer Waterfox, but I find the logo so lame looking I settle for Librewolf. The OOTB settings for LW are super strict and a slog to deal with unless disabled. WF feels like using FF in just about every way.

          • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            Agree on waterfox’s android icon looking bland lol. and a lot of icon packs don’t have an icon for waterfox and still not making it despite requests.

    • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I use Librewolf everywhere but android where I use Firefox. The sync feature works perfectly between the different brands. Librewolf does not currently offer a mobile browser.

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And at some point someone will tell me what is so horrifying about these new features? Mozilla might be the only company trying to provide privacy first AI features. What exactly is so bad here? You can even disable these features if you do not like them at all.

    • cambodia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Mozilla is still the only company maintaining an alternative to Chromium (there’s also webkit if you count Apple). Without Firefox you can’t have Librewolf or other alternatives.

      Mozilla is not perfect but people really need to stop treating them in a purely binary fashion (you are either horrible or are perfect).

      You can criticize Mozilla for the direction they are taking with Firefox, but also you can argue that being a hardcore privacy-centric browser will kill interest for Firefox even faster.

    • techt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ll try to give an out-of-the-loop answer to this, if that helps. Concerning “AI” tools, I think the chunk of people who don’t want it included in the browser on any level come in one or both of two forms. One is a moral opposition – for example, a pro-environmental or pro-artist stance. I don’t think those need much explanation, but feel free to say otherwise.

      The other is in my opinion is in response to exhaustion. Pro-“AI” features have proven themselves to be untrustworthy at nearly every turn with thoughtless or downright irresponsible implementations. A worthwhile use-case is the exception rather than the norm and It’s tiring to have to constantly check if this time I want it on or not. As a result of opt-in-by-default changes to privacy policies or account settings, my trust in any site or app publishing an “AI” implementation has been broken and it’s nice to have options I don’t have to worry about wherever I can get them. I found it irritatingly tone-deaf that Mozilla wasn’t considering a kill-switch with their first swing at this.

      If it seems unreasonable or hard-to-understand, I think taking a step back and looking at the broader software industry rather than just Mozilla will help.

    • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The problem is that they’re pushing it without any way for those of us who really don’t want that crap to strip it out of the browser. I don’t want all this ai garbage, never asked for it, and am harassed at every corner by every fucking company thinking it’s somehow going to change the world.

      Sure, Mozilla allows you to turn off some of these features, but I’ve already had it reenabled in updates after previously disabling it. Further, many of the settings are buried in about:config, which is not a user-friendly way to make those changes. At best, these functionalities should be opt-in and presented as addons that can be installed, rather than being a core part of the browser that cannot be removed.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It is opt in. Or will be. And they’re adding an AI switch.

        Not disagreeing with you, just adding context.

        The bigger problem is that they’re wasting their finite resources on this crap instead of adding actually cool features like their forks are doing.

        • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          They keep saying their ai features will be opt-in, and yet everything they’ve rolled out so far is opt-out. I struggle to believe future ‘features’ will be any different. Maybe it’s opt-in in the sense that I’m not required to click whichever button activates it, like whatever they added to the context menu, but that’s not really what opt-in means and degrades my trust in Mozilla.

          I’m also frustrated by their seeming inability to focus on their core browser product and building a popular competitor to chromium browsers instead of going off on side quests.

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I do not want the dev tools and neither the Extension framework, can I get rid of those? No? Being able to completely disable the features is not enough how? How does the code laying bare on your harddisk get in your way of using FX? They already promised a kill-switch. And you saying it turned on after an update is but an anecdote.

        • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You asked, and I gave my opinion. All this AI bullshit has done and continues to do significant damage to the global economy and ecology, god forbid I have a problem with that or any company contributing to it.

        • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Dev tools doesn’t require a data center to run. Your comparison is flawed and suggests an ill-informed opinion about this topic.

        • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I feel like you’re just here to piss into the wind.

          Do you hear people screaming to disable the extension frame work or devtools?

          No?

          If you don’t want those features you can compile your own version of Firefox and remove them.

          But lots of people are anti-AI. And there are people willing to provide a browser that keeps it out.

          If you want it, have at it. But don’t piss on people just because they don’t.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t know others but for me, it’s the constant bugging with their users. I’ve used Firefox since the beginning, and they have made bad choices before, but this is the last straw. I’m tired of circumventing these choices, sometimes doing so is not even that transparent as a “kill switch” and users had to find strings in a cryptic about::config page, for example.

      More important, I don’t want so-called AI in my life. I couldn’t care less about it. I won’t use it unless it helps me to find some scientific conclusion that advances our culture, and I’m not talking something huge, I’m not saying it shouldn’t be used at all. However, any use of AI for cotidian achievable tasks is morally unacceptable for me, and I’d ask for everyone a space for reflection on whether it is something filling a necessity in their lives. So, I guess it’s a rupture for me with Mozilla. I can’t use their product because I find it fundamentally wrong to support the massive use of technologies that barely do any good to society, and none to the planet. It’s not about another little discrepancy on features and settings, it’s about not giving people like me the platform to shout “fuck it, I don’t want it, stop it now”.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There is no such thing as a privacy first AI, unless you’ve the hardware to run the model yourself (and, you don’t).

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There different kinds of AI and some run just fine locally or even on mobile. Not everything is a big LLM.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Mozilla might be the only company trying to provide privacy first AI features.

      They are not. There are boatloads of privacy friendly “AI” implementations, they just aren’t very high profile.

      But I do think people are over-reacting. This is a less bad approach. And if you can turn it off and leave it off, what’s the big deal?

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Considering Windows is basically saying “we’re going to switch what we’ve always been and become an agenic OS, you will just talk to it and Microsoft Cloud will interpret your will (only $89 a month!)”, people are rightly scared about having all technology rug-pulled from under us.

        Mozilla was one of the shining beacons of FOSS that allowed users choice and stability against corporate greed. Are you surprised that people are angry that they’re caving to the same toxic greedy behavior?

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          They should be worried. It’s pretty clear Mozilla’s leadership has “AI fever” that every CEO seems to be going mad with.

          Still though, people need to take a breath. This isn’t Microsoft. And Mozilla’s “local first” approach is not bowing to Big Tech and the AI conmen like everyone else is (though the reality is that hardware isn’t ready for stuff outside of lightweight tasks).

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I use Floorp on desktop. Since I got used to it, I just can’t live without that advanced sidebar. Being able to open the mobile versions of web pages right on the side is just too useful.

  • anticonnor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Any recommendations for iOS? I switched to Librewolf on my Linux pc and Fennec on my Android phone, but still have Firefox on my iPad. Looking for good alternatives.

    • Statick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 hours ago

      All browsers on iPhone are reskinned Safari as far as I’m aware. I don’t think it matters much what you pick.

      I could be wrong though.

      • anticonnor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        True, I really hate iOS. I only got this iPad for the Apple Pencil and Procreate. I usually try to keep hardware until it dies, but I may need to dump this iPad for my sanity.

        • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, add e-waste because of corporate brand loyalty.

          No one cares what you use. If it fucking works for you, keep using it.

          It’s exhausting keeping up with all the internet outrage over tedious shit that truly does not matter with the short amount of time we all have on this water covered rock spinning in space.

          • anticonnor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Where are you getting the corpo loyalty impression from my post? If I stop using the iPad, it’ll go to someone who will use it. And I wouldn’t be dropping it due to internet outrage, I just don’t like iOS at all, from its gesture controls to its locked App Store.

            • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              its locked App Store.

              I have bad news for you if you are planning to switch to what I think you are…

              Edit: ironically posted this from my Android phone.

              • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                My netizen on the internet, GrapheneOS (what I am currently using), PostmarketOS, and LineageOS are all right over on Android devices - alongside alternate app stores like F-Droid, Accrescent, and anonymous play store front ends like Aurora.

                Let’s not spread lies here, m’kay?

    • yoshisaur@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Haven’t used iOS in a while, but I remember Orion being really good. It can install chrome extensions and Firefox add-ons.