1. Get paid upfront cause Trump famously won’t pay for shit.

  2. Reject the US occupation anyway.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    22 hours ago

    ~5.6 billion USD, to

    • get your free healthcare stripped,
    • get your secularism stripped,
    • get your land polluted,
    • and to get killed by rogue cops.
  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    24 hours ago

    LOL.

    Most people will receive at least $100k in health care in their lives.

    You’d still be better off as a Dane.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 day ago

    They would be very foolish to believe Trump would actually pay them that money. A Trump never pays his bills.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe Trump will go in the same location as Tywin. Even if not, I recommend that be the rumour anyway.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Right… Millions US citizens are starving but he wants to pay foreigners loads of money to join the US. That’s going to work out great! The US has a great track record when it comes to natives. They probably all will be deported to an El Salvador prison or put in a bordered off reserve on top of a landfill.

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Is he trying to pay the shareholders of Greenland above market price so they’ll be willing to merge with the US?

    What the fuck is this even?

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ya know, I bet those residents could start a bidding war if they wanted to. Why take $100k from the US when Canada might give you $150k, or the EU might give you $200k a piece?

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, you can’t have a bidding war when the highest bidder has no intention of paying.

  • I’d love to know the conditions for the payment to happen. Are they going to do what? Force a referendum? They can’t. Are they gonna force people to leave after the payment? With that money? Where to?

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You can give $100k to all homeless Americans and they would go homeless again after 5 to 10 years.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      "What’s exciting is that the research is clear that these cash transfers are helpful, and the big concerns that they might disincentivize employment or contribute to inflation were not substantiated in our evidence review.”

      PN3’s recent evidence review looked extensively at various programs that put money directly in the hands of families, from studies of unconditional cash transfer (UCT) programs in Illinois, Massachusetts and Texas, to existing dividend-based unconditional cash transfers, to child allowance pilot programs throughout the U.S. Two of the largest and most data-rich programs the researchers studied were the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Payments, neither of which was intended to be an anti-poverty program but each of which have measurably reduced poverty among their constituents.

      In 2021, in what amounted to the first and so far, only nationwide case study of the impact of cash transfers, the Biden administration temporarily expanded the federal child tax credit (CTC) through the American Rescue Plan Act. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the expansion lifted 2.1 million children out of poverty. For Black and Latino children, official poverty measures shrank more compared to the decline in rates for white children. The temporary cash infusion also had notable benefits on mental health, again with a greater difference observed with Black families. An additional $100 per child per month reduced depression symptoms in all low-income parents, with Black parents seeing nearly twice the reduction in depression and anxiety symptoms as other subgroups.

      One study found that the monthly cash difference of $313 per month led to some changes in infant brain activity, with infants whose mothers received $333 monthly showing higher “fast-brain” activity compared to babies of mothers receiving $20 monthly. The brain’s mid- and high-frequency bands are associated with cognitive skills, which indicates that cash transfers may improve development of these skills, though more research is needed to draw a direct link.

      According to an analysis at Washington University in St. Louis, child poverty in the U.S. costs up to $1.03 trillion a year in loss of economic productivity, increased health and crime costs, homelessness and maltreatment. Cash transfer policies seem like a bargain in comparison by helping mitigate social challenges and reduce government spending in health and human services.