Bari Weiss’s 60 Minutes edited its latest interview with Donald Trump to make the octogenarian’s responses appear much more sane than they actually were.

During one exchange between Trump and host Ross Douthat on the topic of Ukraine, the staff at 60 Minutes decided to trim several sections of Trump’s response that included false claims or total fabrications.

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 hours ago

    When 60 Minutes edited Kamala Harris’s interview to make her look good, Trump sued them for $16 million. I’m sure he’ll apply the same standard here.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I thought they didn’t even do it to make her look good, but it was to fit around commercial breaks or something and they still aired what she said?

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Correct, it was a totally meritless lawsuit that Paramount (already with Skydance in the driver’s seat, pre-merger close) settled with a nice big fat bribe.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      He initially sued them for $10 billion, but raised it to $20 billion later for damages. Paramount settled for $16 million.

    • oyo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      That interviewer is a conservative nutjob. Read anything he’s written for the New York Times. We’re just so used to seeing Fox and CNN-level interviewing that it felt like a revelation.

    • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      lmao I go to watch it, and all the “suggested videos” are all about the interview, and the election, except for John Oliver. Good ol’ autistic Oliver talkin’ bout Trains. god lov’em

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    What someone should do is take his statements, then next week repeat them to him as something that came from Biden, and watch as he explodes and calls Biden corrupt, a terrorist, etc.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    If they cut pieces out, republicans will claim things were shown out of context or that they were trying to portray a particular picture. Can’t win either way.

  • tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    the staff at 60 Minutes decided to trim several sections of Trump’s response that included false claims or total fabrications.

    So a 30-second interview that was just questions and no responses?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “There’s still a war going on. What’s the biggest obstacle to peace?” asked Douthat.

    “It was the hatred between [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskiy and [Russian President Vladimir] Putin,” Trump said in the version of the program that aired Sunday.

    But much more was left on the cutting room floor, according to an unedited version published Decoding Fox News founder Juliet Jeske. 

    “I believe that we’re very close to making a deal,” Trump said. “And I think it—two things, if I were president, because as you know, well you’re not going to admit it, it was rigged. That’s why I did it a third time. If I was president that war would have never started.”

    During another portion of the interview, 60 Minutes cut Trump’s answer when he attempted to puff himself up as tough on Russia and soft on Ukraine: “Look what I did to them as an example. I gave them the anti-tank busters, right?”

    “I’ve given them, in fact there’s an old statement, that [Barack] Obama gave them sheets, and I gave them anti-tank busters, okay? That’s what I gave them,” Trump said.

    “But now it’s Europe supplying weapons, not us?” asked Douthat.

    “No, it’s us. We’re supplying the weapons, Europe is paying for them,” Trump answered. “Here’s the difference: [Joe] Biden gave them $350 billion worth of cash and weapons. I gave them nothing.”

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What’s wrong with that part?

      During another portion of the interview, 60 Minutes cut Trump’s answer when he attempted to puff himself up as tough on Russia and soft on Ukraine: “Look what I did to them as an example. I gave them the anti-tank busters, right?”

      https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-admin-approves-sale-anti-tank-weapons-ukraine/story?id=65989898

      The Trump administration first approved the sale of Javelins to Ukraine in December 2017 – a step that former President Barack Obama never took and that Trump allies have pointed to as a sign of Trump’s toughness on Russia.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Trump allies have pointed to as a sign of Trump’s toughness on Russia.

        “Here’s the difference: [Joe] Biden gave them $350 billion worth of cash and weapons. I gave them nothing.”

        https://nationalsecurityjournal.org/donald-trump-is-playing-with-fire-the-pentagon-is-now-holding-back-patriot-missiles-ukraine-is-desperate-for-as-leverage/

        He’s fucked Ukraine by withholding arms and money, he’s said russia bombing kindergartens is “fine”, and he wants to ‘end the war’ by giving his daddy Putin everything he wants.

        Trump sold 39 million of javelins eight years ago and is now actively undermining their defense, stopping intel, slowing starlink, allowing civilian deaths and other war crimes to happen every single day. And did they even say Thank You?!?!?

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 hour ago

          As he said:

          “No, it’s us. We’re supplying the weapons, Europe is paying for them,”

          He is tough on Russia and Europe.

          • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            Tough on Russia by removing sanctions? By taking Putin’s side over our own intelligence agency? By constantly saying what a strong leader Putin is?

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 minutes ago

              The US have to split China and Russia to be able to contain China. If the US can win Russia over, their war with China and Russia will be less bloody for them because then it’s only China. So they don’t burn all bridges. Also, less weapons to sell to Europe if the war is over.

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I was just happy to see an interviewer push Trump on harder questions. It’s interesting that he didn’t storm out like a toddler waiting to change his diaper.