• barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Beating well-established Democratic royalty on their home turf by a Muslim is a pretty solid punch in the face.

      He even had Clinton’s endorsement. This was a very clear Fuck You to the Democratic party.

      • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For sure, but we’ve seen hope like this go down the drain before. The circumstances here were favorable I think. RCV primary against an unlikable and disgraced opponent in NYC is hardly a death knell for the national corpo Dems

        • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Agreed as well, and I don’t wanna jump for joy yet but we gotta take our victories as they come. Hopefully this is a snowball that causes an avalanche of change.

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Ehhh zorhan primary win is more like first big hurtle. Now ZOHRAN has to deal with belligerent part of democratic party and independent runs

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He already has, up to this point. In fact, big parts of the party tried to support his competition. They failed. He’s another in AOC mould. He may be good or great but there is an increasing trickle of progressive candidates.

      The more that win by being good the more that can win without being so good. He may not be the Dems saviour but he’s a step in the right direction and a worrying sign for Republicans and establishment politicians.

        • arrow74@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          When I hear that Clinton endorsed a canidate my first tthough was, who cares. That guy hasn’t been in office for over 25 years now. Talk about irrelevant

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m afraid it’s too late though.

    It’s possible - arguably even likely - that the Dem establishment still won’t get the message and will instead continue to try to con us into supporting corrupt neolib hacks and will continue to undermine actual leftists.

    In fact, I sort of half expect the New York party to abandon Mamdani and instead back a write-in campaign for Cuomo.

    I wish I was kidding.

    Even if they show never-before-seen integrity and determination and actualy shift back toward supporting actual leftists (or get replaced by a new generation of leaders who will), I still think it’s likely going to be too late. The longer Trump and his ilk remain in office, the more likely it becomes that opposing them will just get you on the next flight to some overseas concentration camp, or dead, or both.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Yeah hope has security detail. I worry ICE going grab him and disappear him. Especially if it looks like he will win the general election.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the establishment decides open corruption is pretty cool actually and starts trying to rehabilitate Adams’ image. Seems like trying to run both Adams and Cuomo is a fools errand and Adams is stubborn enough to stay in regardless so they’ll have to go with him.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It is too late for electoral politics to save democracy, if that’s what you’re talking about. People like Mamdani are important for the day after, but Trump will have to be deposed much like his ilk in Ukraine and Tunisia.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        37 minutes ago

        I’m always very intrigued by those pushing the rhetoric that it’s too late to use elections to solve this, and admonish anyone that tries.

        But at the same time they themselves refuse to start a revolution they insist is the only way. While simultaneously waiting for someone else to do it for them.

        In the end the suggestion seems to be to not do anything and hope someone else does it for you. Be that by democratic means or armed means.

        If you’re not starting the rebellion you sure as hell need to be engaged with the existing democratic proccess. Otherwise you’re just not doing anything at all. Which is the worst option

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Lets see if you get a President Mamdani in a decade or two. It would be a change for the better.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is NOT true! The ONLY Reason he Won was because we DIDNT have Elon Musk Backing us or make our Platform CLEAR enough! Next time we’ll spend BILLIONS of Dollars LETTING people know we WONT do ANYTHING to Improve Their Lives! THAT will bring them RUSHING back to Us!

    -Chuck Schumer and The DNC!

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Republicans will control the supreme court for the next 20 years. We will see couple of resignations soon so they can appoint younger, crazier judges. Hopefully progressive democrats will be able to stop the slide towards dictatorship but I don’t except any swinging back.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        31 minutes ago

        Allow me to introduce you to my friend court packing.

        But also in terms of things like Roe, all we need to fix that is a law passed through congress. The court would have no constitutional basis challenging it at that point. If they did it loops back around to justifying court packing.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Uh, yeah? Inthesetimes is posted all the time. Had you not?

      I’m not sure why you’re linking to that non-profit. Are they the owners? It’s there any reason you’d expect people to recognize them?