The family of a Canadian national who supported Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportations of immigrants say they are feeling betrayed after federal agents recently detained the woman in California while she interviewed for permanent US residency – and began working to expel her from the country.

“We feel totally blindsided,” Cynthia Olivera’s husband – US citizen and self-identified Trump voter Francisco Olivera – told the California news station KGTV. “I want my vote back.”

Cynthia Olivera, a 45-year-old mother of three US-born children, thus joined a growing list of examples contradicting the Trump administration’s claims that the immigration crackdown it has spearheaded since the president’s return to the Oval Office in January has prioritized targeting dangerous criminals.

Well, Canadian, obviously a commie with the healthcare etc

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    LOL! They’re a bunch of racist neo-Nazi fucks. If the Cynthia tries to get Francisco to Canada, Canadian Immigration should deny them.

  • MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Fuck these people.

    They should have listened to what all of us were telling them constantly.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In 2024, toward the end of his presidency, Joe Biden’s administration granted her a permit allowing her to work legally in the US

    But voted Trump and probably blames Biden for this

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The hatred towards non whites really resonated with her. They were supposed to go after them not people like her.

    • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s a step in the right direction, but ultimately, the best solution would be an imperative mandate. I have no idea how we’ve let ourselves get gaslit that free mandates (once someone is elected they can do what they want, regardless of voter intention) is somehow more democratic than imperative mandates.

    • redsunrise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I love this idea, but the main obstacle this has to overcome is the voter’s knowledge of the issues and any given candidate stances on them. If we implemented this in the US, I feel like most people would still simply delegate all their votes to one candidate or all candidates of a particular party. It’s a lot of information for a working person to keep track of. Any idea on how to overcome this with paper ballots? Or are computerized ballots with all relevant information embedded within the way to go?

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Haven’t seen this posted in a while. I forgot you can delegate your vote to different people for different issues. How is the “category” of an issue decided though?

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Then the delegator has to vote/delegate on every issue-- they don’t need expertise themselves like in a direct democracy, but it is still an issue due to sheer vote volume.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 minutes ago

            Yeah pretty much. You trust your guy until you change your mind or feel that you need to change your vote. Not really seeing a problem with that.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    dumb fucks.

    what did they actually think would happen? the shit he said he was going to do was going to be directed at everyone but them because they were “special”?

    • 0li0li@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, because they are special… Only brown, dirty, poor people would get kicked out or dissapeared. They are ok with that. They have money so evidently it would not affect them.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    11 hours ago

    imagine being a grown ass adult and being surprised by this

    imagine also thinking you’re entitled to sympathy from anyone after voting for literally this

    those people can go fuck themselves. i’m glad they’re suffering

  • goombakid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not one to be super religious, but I think Galatians 6:7 fits well here.

    “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.”