• SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Comrade, why are you sitting and drawing? Are you crazy? The good times are over, it’s time to go to a construction site under AI control!

    Well, as for our human bosses, who knows, maybe they are just a myth?

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Honestly, everything that machines can do, there are some people who love doing it, and there can be an art to it. And for each such thing, other humans hate doing it and prefer automation.

      Some people love cleaning, but we have robot vacuums and mops.

      Some people love cooking and baking, but we have packaged food that requires minimal or no preparation.

      Some people love woodworking or glassblowing, but most of our furniture and household items are mass produced.

      Some people love managing their own computer or phone, but most people prefer to just let the manufacturer and operating system do it for them.

      Some people love growing food with manual tools, but most farming these days is done with automatic machines.

      Some people love driving, others can’t wait for self-driving cars or prefer public transport just so they don’t have to drive.

      The list goes on. Anything can be an art.

      I don’t know what my stance is on this. I think automation is necessary for the sheer quantities we need. I also think passionate professionals can nearly always do a better job than a machine, but it’s obviously more expensive and can’t keep up with demand.

      I guess the difference is that drawing and writing only have value as art. If I don’t like drawing I almost never have to do it, but if I don’t like preparing food I either suck it up and do it anyway hating every moment, or it can be (and, in fact, is) a serious detriment for my health and well-being.

      • fading_person@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 seconds ago

        I guess the main difference in all those activities is when doing something for yourself, as a hobby or relaxing activity, or when doing something as an obligation, or even worse, doing something for others. Even something like drawing can become terrible if you have to stress yourself, follow someone’s orders instead of your own style, and have to do it fast to meet some deadline.

      • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Right, personally I don’t like cooking and would be fine with automating that (instead of just ordering/heating junk food).

        The most important thing is not to replace stuff completely, but give the choice to each and every individual person themselves. Great if it’s available, also great if you don’t want to use it.

        And if you use it, don’t be a dick and claim it was you who did it.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        love cleaning

        Freaks

        robot vacuum

        That doesn’t really work and spies on you. Still requires human intervention.

        cooking

        Not if you want it to taste good. You’re thinking of restaurants.

        some people get off on being pwnd

        That’s a serious problem on so many levels.

        furniture

        You think i wouldn’t like some good handmade shit that will last firever instead of this ikea crap that will come apart a little every time i move it? But i get told my labor isnt worth that. So the old growth wood gets chopped into tiny pieces for my fückyoü cabinets. Still made by people btw. I will dig up William morris and stroke his century dead disintegrated corpse dick til it soaks you in formaldehyde over this.

        food is mostoy automated

        Nope. You’re just wrong about this. It’s a seeious problem with these harsh border regimes; no farm labor. People will go hungry.

        only have value as ‘art’

        No.

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Half of those “quotes” are either made up by you or you didn’t quote enough context to even understands what you’re saying.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Not exact words. Concepts so you know what section or idea of yours im referring to. Have you tried to precisely copy paste on a fuck damn touch screen? Im sorry, but you’re not worth that. I’m not worth that. Nobody is worth that.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s much easier to treat it as an art if you do it because you want to, not because you have to.

      Like most things in life, really.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Twenty years ago, some savvy engineers created the Rumba. It’s a kind of annoying overpriced vacuum cleaner, but you can at least see the edges of a useful appliance.

    Ten years ago, everyone was smelling their own farts about the advent of autonomous taxis. And, idk, we can at least pretend we’re in the ballpark right now.

    Today, it’s noticeable how AI feels like a surrender on actual autonomous machines. Like, the idea of doing actual robotics is out the window. We’re only going to spend our money on a solved problem - data processing - and see what we can wring out of it.

    I do wonder what this will mean in another ten or twenty years.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, that robotics stuff is happening still (e.g. little robot mowers using machine vision for easier guidance).

      But you are right that the prospect of advanced robotics gets a fraction of the attention that chatbots get. Trillions of bets on datacenter bound LLMs that can generate images, videos, and text but a relative pittance for advancements that would translate to physical labor…

      I get that there’s value, but the value proposition seems way out of whack.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So this is scary. We already know that POTUS has no quams about using ai to make shit fake videos. I would be surprised if his plan for indefinite term is actually chat gpt plan.

      Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.

      • realitista@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.

        I think mostly it just tells you what it thinks you want to hear. If you push it hard enough to tell you something, it will tell you that. Grok, OTOH, is explicitly trained to try to give you biased answers.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ps. Chat gpt DOES actively try to manipulate you.

        No, it doesn’t “try” to do anything. Don’t antropomorphise it.

        • blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s a short hand way of communicating. Like saying that a good search engine tries to find the most relevant sites. Or a streaming algorithm tries to recommend videos that you’ll watch. It’s not that we are saying these things are conscious or whatever. We’re just describing what they do.

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      there is plenty of work going on autonomous front but its solely focused on means to kill the peasants who try to inconvenience the oligarchs. take a look at palmers anduril industries. there are other such companies based in the confederate states.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s a lot of salesmanship going on. But whether it really does anything or it just outsources work to a Mechanical Turk or blows smoke up your ass?

        Even Lavender AI seems more like an excuse for conventional manual massacre than a real Skynet for Palestinians.

        What does Anduril do that the NSA or the CIA wasn’t already doing, except maybe putting a thick coat of bullshit on the conclusion?

        • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          nsa and cia can’t whack large number of americans without some risk of mutiny from the soldiers. ai based large scale precision strike does give them both the capability and excuse to do so. what’s easier, to ask 100k soldiers to kill 2-3 people each and feel no guilt or a dozen narcissistic psychopaths to kill 10k people each and feel godlike ? its not really rocket science just track their cell and do a missile/drone strike at the location with basic face detection. they don’t care for few false-positives. its not like any of the targets will be living near oligarchs palace or mega-yacht

          you are right the lavender is far from skynet but it lets the israeli scums say that they are not indiscriminately killing innocents but based on petabytes of data analysed by microsoft. and you can’t punish ai for mistakes. bombing kids collecting water or destroying a dialysis center, oopsie sorry the ai hallucinated, we will ask trump for a multi-billion refund to buy more bombs for proper testing.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            nsa and cia can’t whack large number of americans without some risk of mutiny from the soldiers

            I haven’t seen any evidence of that. If anything, the number of ex-military in the new ICE would suggest the opposite.

            it lets the israeli scums say that they are not indiscriminately killing innocents but based on petabytes of data analysed by microsoft

            Sure. Drop a bomb, kill a dozen people, get a little print out that says “all of these people were terrorists”.

            It works well in Israel largely because the public (and particularly the military) are juiced on hate. They’ve already done 90% of the work of indoctrination up front.

            You don’t even talk about hallucinations. You just say “data indicated terrorists” and move on.

            But it’s trivial to tell a computer to tag a picture of a person as <img person=“terrorist”>. That’s not something Palmer Luckey needs a multi billion dollar payday to accomplish. Just like with Elon, a bunch of this tech is smoke and mirrors. It’s six guys dragging a CyberTaxi on stage, so a few dorks can step out and say “The Future is Magic Cars!”

  • Dimi Fisher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Stupid meme, people have already did the artwork they have stole to train their “ai” machines, so basically they say to our face that we can steal and do whatever we want with it but you cannot