Trump official says funds will be released ‘only when states prove they are being spent legitimately’

The changes to US childcare services as part of a response to a viral video, made by a self-described “independent journalist” and rightwing influencer, that purported to discover massive fraud at daycare centers operated by Somali Americans in Minneapolis.

However, other news outlets have not been able to verify the claims made in the video. Allegations of exploitation of Minnesota’s social safety net have also been extensively covered by local and national news media over the past several years, and prosecutors brought charges over one allegedly massive scheme during the Biden administration.

In recent weeks, Trump has intensified his xenophobic attacks on Somali Americans, including his long-running nemesis Ilhan Omar, a representative from Minnesota who is Somali American and came to the US as a refugee. He has said that Omar is “garbage” and said Somalia is “no good for a reason”.

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    This country so desperately wants loads of children, but makes it so challenging to support the kids

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As long as Elon can afford his 50th yacht and fund a robot army for himself, that’s the most important thing.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Project 2025. So that women will have to stay home.

    Ain’t gonna go like they think it will.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Women are not having babies anymore. And more and more of us are taking a very firm stand on this.

        • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I dunno about that. Even if being a minor is a crime punishable by summary execution, people will still pop out more humans anyway. Nothing but complete infertility of the human race can stop that.

          • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You do know that worldwide birthrates have dropped dramatically in the last few years, right? For example it is estimated that by 2050 China will have about 600 million people. There are still babies being made but not to the extent there should be this is why the birthrate is declining.

              • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Looks like “at replacement rate”, which is a little over 2 for humans overall since we’re a near-even split on sex and not every human born will have children.

                China’s per-uterus replacement rate is probably substantially higher than other countries, due to an unintended effect of their “one child” policy.

                They’ve known that their population is too huge for decades, and if they manage to drop down to USA-equivalent levels for their habitable size without become a failed state it’ll be the single greatest achievement of a communist state towards world peace.

            • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              We should start feeding all the dead bodies to sharks.

              The oceans would have so many sharks.

              Sharks, as far as the eye can see. Ah. What a world that would be.

              Hammerhead sharks. Nurse sharks. Great white sharks. Reef sharks. So many sharks.

              Edit:

              SHARKS!

              Sharks?

              Where?

              They’re over here and over there, in fact they’re everywhere!

              They’re in the rivers in the sea, why there’s sharks! Sharks! As far as the eye can so. Oh what a world that would be.

              But Fred, I don’t see any sharks around, this might be in your head. Are confused? Are you concussed? Have you been fooled? Is this a ruse? Fred? Fred!?

              They haven’t been born yet Mark, but look around this lovely park, it’s full of old ones, covered in gold bond, they’re not long for this earth, and then what is their worth?

              Mark, mark, just think about the people in this park, their walkers gone without a song to sing with mouths or hearts. Should we bury them in stinking earth or burn them in Fort Worth?

              There’s one solution that I see, it’s sharks, and mankind’s future’s there in shimmering seas.

              When it’s my time to depart this earth, my body’s lost its only worth, so wait until the night is dark and throw me to the sharks.

              The sharks, the sharks, they’ll feed on human flesh and breed and choke the rivers and the seas, this I ask my dearest Fred, that you do when I’m dead, the shark, the sharks, that’s the burial for me.

          • fodor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            15 hours ago

            The statistics show that you’re mostly wrong. Yes of course some births will continue, but the birth rate has dropped and will continue to do so. Just look at Japan or South Korea to see how it looks.

            • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              14 hours ago

              But Generation Beta in the US will still be large enough to exceed Minimum Viable Population. And as a last resort, more young people can be shipped in.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s like taking candy from a baby. In that it is taking food from babies.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because that’s what a total asshole would do.

    Anyway…all sorts of meat products have vegan food smeared all over them… Like ketchup! In your face everyone! You guys thought you were being funny. In reality we vegans have been trolling your ass the entire time! So don’t worry, you’re not as big an asshole as the guy taking childcare services away.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If people were to say that people shouldnt have kids because of most other unchosen life circumstances (for example, “you shouldnt have kids because you belong to a cultural/ethnic group that we dont like”), that sentiment would be seen as prejudice. If one was to go further and suggest that government policy should reflect this, that policy would be seen as an injustice. But if people say “you shouldnt have kids because you’re poor”, that’s somehow seen as wisdom, and advocating that government policy reflect this by cutting off support systems is somehow seen as an acceptable position to hold. Given that people dont exactly choose to be poor, I find this inconsistent.

      In any case, kids are not merely some expensive luxury. They are both something that any society needs a certain number of to sustainably function (since obviously, a society simply cant exist without people, and people dont live forever), and which represent a significant amount of generally unpaid labor to raise. Not everyone needs to have them, and some people just arent good with them or dont want them, but when your society’s birthrate is below what is sustainable in the long run, telling some of the people that actually do want to have kids not to, because you expect those people to pay for everything themselves without help from the society that eventually needs those people, is a stupid policy, and not exactly fair. Why should everyone else get to avoid the consequences of an aging and declining society, but expect only those that choose to be parents to pay for that?

    • Ach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You can work a forty hour work week, live responsibly, pay all your bills and taxes on time, etc, and still be below the poverty line in America. You can have kids while financially stable and get hurt or sick. You could have kids and your spouse could die.

      This is a foolish, uneducated comment.

      • Big Bolillo@mgtowlemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        51
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Isn’t foolish, it’s just common sense… if you can’t afford kids why will you have them in the first place?

        I mean it’s 2026 isn’t like birth control was invented yesterday.

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You paid absolutely ZERO attention to the comment Ach made.

          Your situation today is NOT guaranteed to be your situation tomorrow. You can afford kids today and get hit by a bus tomorrow, and now you can’t. Don’t pretend to be so thick you don’t understand how circumstances can change beyond one’s control.

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Right. Except that half of pregnancies are unplanned… Not sure where that takes your reasoning.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What about the people who thought about it, budgeted the payments into those plans but now can’t afford the children because of the unforeseeable changes?

      • Xander707@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t think the person you are responding to has nearly enough brain cells to comprehend such an obvious follow up question.