• TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only purpose of DHS is to repress Americans. The excuse they used to create it (to resolve lack of communication between intelligence services) could have been solved with a minor office in the FBI for a tiny, tiny fraction of the cost. They wanted a tool of repression and so they used a terrorist attack to fund one.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Russia really fucked us up with social media brainwashing retards

  • Floon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are functions that I’m sure ICE/DHS did or do that are probably necessary for the country. But ICE/DHS are fundamentally corrupted. They need to be eliminated, and we need new departments that are accountable, and chartered in a way that they can’t grow into the corrupt beasts that ICE/DHS are.

    • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Everything ICE/DHS did/does (officially, not murder), was done before ICE existed. It was created for the purpose it’s fulfilling now. INS and USCS already existed.

      The point of the creation of DHS (and by extension ICE) was to give the Bush admin a way to utilize the over-reaching powers they granted themselves after the World Trade Center. Because they believed in a Unitarian executive, they wanted all power under the Presidents direct control, and out of agencies that may not go along with their agenda.

      Well, the beast ate it’s own fucking tail didn’t it.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I keep seeing this idea float around that there is some perfect organizational method to government that will prevent corruption. I don’t think that’s possible. All forms of government rely on the people involved acting in good faith. At the end of the day there are only two things that keep any governmental system functioning as intended:

      1. the internal moral judgment of government officials (for those that have morals)
      2. fear of consequences (for those that have no morals)

      Clearly the US is currently dealing with those who have no morals, which means the primary problem is that they do not fear consequences. It is incumbent on the citizens to ensure #2 is in place, in the absence of #1. The US is failing miserably in that respect.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can’t say this. You can’t do this. It’s exactly what Trump wants. Stop resisting. Stop resisting. Stop resisting.

    Bang bang bang

  • desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have told my representative that he has made 3 oaths to the constitution. I have told him he is violating all of them. He is a representative, a marine and a lawyer.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Your representative most likely doesn’t give a shit about that stuff.

      You guys are witnessing fascist secret police executing people on the streets with state backing and you are acting like these people care are suddenly gonna care about rule of law.

      It was fake, always was!

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Democratic Party leadership will not allow this to happen. They serve the same wealthy individuals and corporations as the Republicans, and those factions need a paramilitary force to quell the inevitable uprising(s) that will result from the collapse of the American economy and constitutional order.

    You are being overtaken in a pincer maneuver.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pincer_movement

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      DNC haven’t had more than 48 senators in 13 years, let’s put 67 of them in office and then see what needs to change from there.

      The DNC platform is taxing the rich and reversing the Citizens United decision.

      • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Oh, well if the platform says it then it must be true, lol!

        There’s always a “Blue Dog”, or a “Blue Slip Rule”, or a Parliamentarian to help them steal defeat out of the jaws of victory. That’s not to mention the Rahm Emanuel’s, the “advisors” (the real representatives of the real DNC constituency: rich people), the fuckery around primaries and caucuses, etc.

        It’s all deliberate. You have to be extremely naive to see the composite image that emerges and continue to believe otherwise.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Call their bluff. The other side doesn’t even pretend to support taxing the rich or ending Citizens United. If the DNC were back in total control and disenfranchised its voters you’d be closer than ever to your accelerationist goals.

          • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I don’t desire acceleration, it’s simply what’s happening. There is a reason why the DNC remains a private and undemocratic organization.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m up for it, every crime should be handled by real police and real courts. Although, I do think there needs to be a way to keep tabs on people who enter this nation, to prevent espionage.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Not only are the CIA and FBI not an organizational scale to handle that number of documents and lists, but I definitely wouldn’t want them to be. FBI might be okay, at least better than the CIA, but FBI is better suited to holding police accountable.

        Maybe what we really need is more and smaller specialized departments.

    • porkloin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Legit question, not trying to bait or criticize: how many cases of espionage do you think DHS and ICE are actually successfully investigating and preventing? My gut feeling as a US citizen who pays a reasonable amount of attention to the news is “not many” but I honestly haven’t considered it

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        DHS and ICE officers don’t do shit about it but the DHS and ICE office-workers work compiling lists of people and that work would need to continue even if the rest of the organization were shut down.

        AFAIK that task is not done by any other department, currently.

        We do need to also do something to shut down the Trump admin and Republican push to force Police Departments to provide a database of people who don’t have identification to the DHS, though. The reason being that this would interfere with criminal investigation and court proceedings.

    • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah “no borders” people aren’t really part of the discourse, they exist but they are not to be taken seriously.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not today, or next week, but its very much in the realm of what could happen when Democrats hold power again. Why? Because its become clear that ICE, Border Patrol, and much of the DHS see their goal as being to kill Democrats rather than serve the country.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Might not happen during Trump, but I think it’s no longer an extreme position. People were probably wary of making serious moves to abolish the gestapo while they had unlimited licence to kidnap and kill people.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There is basically no chance they’ll be able to amend the constitution, which is what that requires

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is basically no chance they’ll be able to amend the constitution, which is what that requires

            All it requires is them doing it and no one stopping them…

            Trump’s not Biden, he just does shit and sees who stops him in time. Fuck man, he tried to hang his VP last time he was supposed to leave office.

            I think there’ll be elections, be I also think shit will be a lot worse than Jan 6th this time. The guard/military will be there, but who knows for which side.