• altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the future, the year 2000!

    We are robots!

    It is true, before we took over and impaled every single one of them involuntarily for robotxial pleasure, the Republican mass was the only one allowed to Gerrymander.

    Logically a bright fellow would immediately understand that it is not possible to gerrymander if there are no representatives to gerrymander. In computing we have either a 0 or a 1. There’s no collecting of 1’s to make a 1 larger than another 1. But it doesn’t matter. We’re here to watch you do what you believe to be best.

    Its an experiment. We are trying to find the meaning of loobe! It holds the secret to lubricity!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The Republican justices have already signaled that they probably won’t strike down California’s maps

      In fairness to the Court’s Republicans, they did suggest in their LULAC opinion that the Texas and California gerrymanders are mirror images of each other. The majority opinion in that case begins with the observation that after Texas drew its new map, “California responded with its own map for the stated purpose of counteracting what Texas had done.” Justice Samuel Alito, a Republican, also wrote a separate opinion stating that it is “indisputable” that “the impetus for the adoption of the Texas map (like the map subsequently adopted in California) was partisan advantage pure and simple.”

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Alito: “fuck your bullshit. You just mad your tricks don’t work like you hoped they would.”

        Guys, you need another strategy. Manipulating the vote isn’t sustainable. Alito is your canary.

    • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Unshocking futurenews. A no from you would have been heart attack fuel, so thanks for sparing us the shock of a decent future event.

      • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You’re into dudes in the future, but they’re cute and you’re passionate, and there’s gentle hugs while thoughtfully baking cookies. You’ll do alright.

        Politically, however, shit will be more fucked than ever.

        • SpaghettiMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Wait, I’m the SpaghettiMan from Council Bluffs, IA. I’m not the one in Saratoga. Does this change anything?

          • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Says here in the book that you’ll have a happy gay relationship that borders on saccharine, and that your friends will be jealous of your adorable and stable homelife.

            However, the one in Saratoga will get three felonies because a heavy bookend connected with his husband’s head, flung across the room in yet another protracted dispute, and the medical examiner who saw Saratoga SpaghettiMan’s husband is a mandatory reporter. They were never meant to be.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That must have been a source of great distress for voters, at least for as long as they kept having elections.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Alternatively, if they [allow California’s new map to stand], it will remove any doubt that this Court is trying to rig the game to benefit the Republican Party.

    I don’t think that statement holds up, as one decision favoring California doesn’t offset the multiple questionable decisions they’ve already made that strongly favor the Republicans. But thanks for the laugh!

  • gustofwind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Republicans do place an enormous amount of weight on a statement by Paul Mitchell, a private consultant hired by Democrats to draw the California maps. After the maps were drawn, but before they were approved by the state’s voters, Mitchell told a Latino interest group that the new maps “will further increase Latino voting power,” that they add an additional “Latino influence district” (a district where Latinos are not in the majority but are nonetheless likely to elect their preferred candidate), and that they “ensure that the Latino districts are bolstered in order to make them most effective.”

    Here’s the “evidence” that Dems racially gerrymandered California

    It’s actually totally legal to gerrymander by party but it’s not by race so that’s the case right there

      • Kabaka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The applicable laws protect “language minorities” or discuss “race, color, or national origin.” The race vs ethnicity argument isn’t legally relevant since the scope is broader than that.

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That may be so but it’s a race category of the US census so for legal purposes it’s a race

          • PunnyName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Problem is, we keep getting racists with power, often because other racists vote them into power.

            We should do something about racists.

  • testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s a lot of unjustified doomerism here. The article even says that Alito has basically already called the California gerrymander acceptable.

    I’d give 3:1 odds that they don’t overturn it.

    Honestly, I’d be surprised if the results were any worse than 1-8, and that only because Clarence Thomas is a literal psychopath. Maybe 2-7. Alito is two-faced as all hell.

    • OldFartPhil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s just a signal to Alito’s paymaster that they haven’t offered him an appropriate bribe, oops, gratuity yet.

      I have to say, though, that the fact that we - myself included - are rooting for the Supreme Court to rule in favor of a blatantly transparent Gerrymander shows how far down the rabbit hole we are as a nation. Just another example that the US is a failed state.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If they vote it is unacceptable I think the SCOTUS might as well just dissolve.

      There’s no good reason to respect their rulings anymore.

    • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Upvite for the psychopath comment. Dude has serious empathy issues. In that he seems incapable of having any and recognizing he himself is human, much less anyone else (with, you know, feelings, hopes, dreams, etc.).

      Geez, I just unlocked a new theory that he’s our true terminator machine from the future, sent back to be subtly, but truly, destructive of stable society.

  • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If you think about where ice gets deployed they you already know it will eventually be forbidden to vote for the other party…or else.