Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn’t sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I think its one of the reasons reddit will never reach the mainstream like reddit. For one people find it confusing to find a community which I disagree with, you just need to take a slight effort to understand that you have a choice of community and in return you get great freedom. Since its mostly for more techies I and its overwhelmingly like left, people with moderate right views will feel like they’re completely out of place.

    Im also sad that many of the bigger communities like ml have unhinged mods that ban for anyone disagreeing with them. For example some calls for violence being overwhelmingly onesided on here made me feel sick at times. But I don’t feel like sparking that debate over here.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Im also sad that many of the bigger communities like ml have unhinged mods that ban for anyone disagreeing with them. For example some calls for violence being overwhelmingly onesided on here made me feel sick at times. But I don’t feel like sparking that debate over here.

      For people interested on that topic, !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works is a dedicated community

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Echo chambers are never good, no matter the politics. Just reading this comment thread is proof. Some of these comments are fucking ridiculous.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Weird seeing you again, and seeing you say this, after you quickly resorted to name-calling over a disagreement in another thread just 20 minutes ago. Do you really not think that you’re a member of the half you refer to? I’m not so sure you actually want “diversity of opinions” or “normal people” if that’s been your response so far.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          You took a bad position, I clarified why it was unfounded.

          That’s called a discussion. You are entitled to post your opinion, I am entitled to provide a rebuttal.

          That’s how discourse works.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh no, the poor right whingers aren’t being represented here.

        Oh wait, good. Fuck ‘em.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They still have to suffer from shiti health insurance…

          But sure let’s make sure nobody but a good neo libs “allies” are permitted here champ

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            In your country sure.

            And who the fuck wants neo libs here? Neo libs (and libs) are right wing ideologies.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it helps to place labels onto things… and then respect those labels.

    Like porn: it can get someone literally fired if they chanced upon such at work - some corpos are just looking for any excuse to cut costs, especially a repeating salary one. But so long as it is labeled, and does not appear outside of bounds… then what is the harm? (more even, studies show that places that ban porn tend to have higher rates of sexualized crime i.e. rape, so the presence of porn literally seems to help society?)

    And politics: so many of us here LOVE to discuss it! But what if someone had anxiety, and could not? Could they use something like hashtags, keywords, trigger warnings I dunno, and block out most of it, for the sake of their sanity? If not, then their only recourse would be to opt-out of the Fediverse entirely, thereby taking all of the content that they would have contributed with them…

    Full disclosure of my own biases: this is why I am against places such as ChapoTrapHouse from being federated with most Lemmy instances (even as I support e.g. lemm.ee’s desire to keep it) - it’s not that I want it to “not exist” (I’ve enjoyed many of my own interactions there… though it is also simultaneously true that many users from hexbear [or their alts] act as toxic bullies, ignoring people’s consent outside of those spaces, despite being told explicitly not to by their admins), so much as that I want it to be properly labeled & constrained, so that someone does not walk into it unawares, not realize what it is, and then leave the Fediverse entirely having been turned away from us due to their interactions with them.

    Likewise much of the content on lemmy.ml is very much not only anti-capitalist, but anti-Western - the former I sympathize with, though the vehemence with which it is delivered and especially the latter will turn people away, as it definitely has me (especially when it abuses blatantly false tropes).

    And that is the identical reason why we cannot federate with conservative spaces either, if we want to survive: it is not that we want them to not exist so much as we cannot host their content here, without making THAT action a part of our own identity. And to be clear, I don’t mean content such as “God loves us, each & every one of us” (that’s kinda an awesome thought, is it not, regardless of what we each personally believe?), but rather “I know I speak for [my specific version of a god] when I say that he (she? it? them? other?) hates some people, especially YOUR type in particular!”

    But even if we took it as a given, purely for the sake of a hypothetical argument mind you, that we actually did want some type of space to not exist, what are we going to do about it - sabotage their servers? And after they spin up new ones, with better protections - then what? No, the real recourse (imho) is to simply leave them be, yet not choose to federate their content here. We all were young & naive once too - they may grow given time, or not, but that’s their business, and all we can and should (and actually MUST) control is ours.

    In all of the above cases - including the pornography example - it is not what the content is (or sometimes not just that), so much as the unfriendliness of it appearing outside of bounds, causing legitimate pain and harm when it is exposed to people.

    I think the way to maximize utility is to increase diversity by increasing welcomingness. Sorta like how Linux does not push people into any one distro, or window manager, or anything at all - we each are free to pursue our own paths. That’s fucking awesome!:-P

    Lest anything think that I’ve refused to answer the question: it is both. Our (future) political diversity can both be a wedge driven between us - if we allow that to happen naturally - or else a source of strength, e.g. to allow a centrist person to post content unrelated to their political beliefs (woodworking? a game community?), so long as they are respectful of other people’s beliefs in the process. We don’t all have to like one another, just get along. In diversity we find strength… or we could, if we did it right, i.e. if only the ones offered in good faith were allowed to stay while all others given the boot, and even then they need to remain within their allotted lanes.

    img

    Preemptively to the people who will scroll to the bottom of this, see me saying that diversity is a strength, and comment or just downvote and move on without bothering to read the rest: fuck you. But to anyone willing to offer a good-faith critique: I am listening.

  • I don’t see it as either. I don’t come to social media to engage in political discussions, so for me, the bigger issue is the lack of thriving communities around topics outside of national/world politics and technology. I’d love to see more places like startrek.online.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nazis and their ilk can be here, they just have to contend with a lot of disagreement when they broadcast their opinions.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s not too far off already, considering .ml, grad, and hexbear’s propensity to advocate for violence against others for being “liberals.”

          Basically it’s already a nazi bar with some red paint and a star on the door. The people who I told about lemmy all left pretty quick because of it and I’ve stopped recommending it to people entirely.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The people who I told about lemmy all left pretty quick because of it and I’ve stopped recommending it to people entirely.

            This post could interest you: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/32469271

            Long story short, discuss.online defederated hexbear recently, making it a potential recommendation for new joiners (they also block lemmygrad)

            https://lemmy.cafe/ blocks ml too, but they have the 0.19.7 pictures bug. Once they fix that, they could become another go-to recommendation for new joiners.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That’s good to know, I’ll keep an eye on it, thanks! But tbh the reality is that .ml is still too integral to defed yet, until your decentralization efforts take hold (and btw I try to sub to the other communities whenever I see you post one I’m interested in and will sometimes unfollow the .ml one if I can, thanks for all the recommendations!)

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  That may be true tbh, I’m more techy so I can’t yet but maybe for someone who isn’t they could.

                  Keep at it for sure! If this place really ends up thriving and getting bigger for niche interests and stuff it’s in no small part because of your efforts to do so! I genuinely appreciate it, even for stuff I’m not personally interested in.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m not either, but that’s like saying “I don’t want my TV full of gays!” because a sitcom has a gay character.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Weakness, If you’re here for anything other than the narrow view.

    Even if you’re here for the the narrow view take a moment and consider if an echo chamber is good for you.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I find the limited political knowledge a far bigger concern. The US has taken perfectly acceptable words and butchered them: liberal, libertarian, conservative, left, fascist, socialist etc mean different things inside the US to what they mean everywhere else. I reckon US political language hasn’t butchered itself - there’s a plan in there somewhere.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed but I want to push you to go further: it’s not just politics that has been so influenced.

      Even Google searches - once world-renowned for their recall and precision and overall helpfulness, now are shit. Reddit as well. Twitter… well, apparently was always a hellhole? :-P YouTube was not though - until it was bought by Google.

      Enshittification destroys all that it touches. Even/especially governments. Though the same happened to Rome, so many thousands of years ago. And to Russia too, more recently, despite it ostensibly calling itself “communist”/leftist.

      I do think that there was a plan to help move it along, but I also think that it might have been an inevitable consequence of (more or less) entirely unfettered capitalism, and that those two worked together to destroy a nation that once was struggling far less than it seems to be doing lately?

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m here because I DON’T want to have to read fucked up opinions. People here are mostly nice compared to mainstream platforms.

    I’m all for difference of opinion, but not when one of those opinions is “we should oppress LGBT people” for example. 10-15 years ago, I’d have been more receptive to discussing opposing opinions, but shit has changed. A lot of those opposing opinions are now simply unacceptable to even entertain, because they’ve become a real, actual threat to my well-being. People aren’t discussing tax policy anymore, they are discussing imposing states of emergency to do some kind of purge on undesirables.

    Some people call it an echo chamber, I just call it chilling and having fun with like-minded people. There’s nothing wrong with that. That’s what forums have always been.

        • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah. Tankies are wrong, but they’re also powerless. Conservatives actually have power though, and are extremely dangerous.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            An idea being “bad” is power agnostic. If I want to blow up orphanages, wanting to do so is bad whether I’m the president or a homeless dude, the ability to follow through may change with power, but the ability to follow through isn’t what makes “wanting to blow up orphanages” bad, the idea itself is bad.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      People here are mostly nice compared to mainstream platforms.

      Try disagreeing with the hive mind. Anyone can be nice to someone who echo’s their own opinion. The real niceness of a person is revealed when they can show civility to people they disagree with (I’m not talking about LGBTQ oppressors or Nazis…there’s a huge spectrum of opinions that aren’t extreme).

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m on BlueSky on top of IceShrimp because anything better than Twitter is good to use at this point.

        Let’s see how downvoted I get.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m also on BlueSky as well as Mastodon, because BlueSky has the momentum right now, and critical mass is important.

          In that same vein, I wish you’d treat LW as you do any other instance. We’re not hostile to other instances, and I think there’s a healthy balance right now. It doesn’t hurt Lemmy to have a bigger, more mainstream instance. I think defederation solely for the sake of defederation does hurt Lemmy.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I wish you’d treat LW as you do any other instance. We’re not hostile to other instances, and I think there’s a healthy balance right now. It doesn’t hurt Lemmy to have a bigger, more mainstream instance. I think defederation solely for the sake of defederation does hurt Lemmy.

            I never advocated for defederation of LW, just for more decentralization rather than have 90% of the active communities on LW.

            You never answered my latest comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/13624614

            Just to make it sure, are you saying that it’s not true that at this moment

            What prevents you from locking !television@lemmy.world, redirect to !showsandmovies@lemm.ee, and get that community more active?

            I can even make you or any other LW mod mod of that community too, I’m not attached to being a mod, I just want communities to flourish on other instances as well.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Because besides monthly active users, LW has 4,600 subscribers where lemm.ee has 537. It’s not a clear cut case.

              • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                What good is 4600 subscribers when 754 are active?

                I just checked the updated numbers, now it’s 2.57k monthly active users for lemm.ee vs 958 on LW.

                On !showsandmovies@lemm.ee, we actively build the community, we have a best of 2024 post, we opened the moderation posts to any person willing to help, while you keep that community unmoderated with 2 bots as mods.

                Really, I just don’t understand. What are you afraid of? I’m pretty sure that !mapporn@lemmy.world had more subs than !map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz when it was locked down, but it was still okay, because the activity was happening on the sopuli instance.

                I just checked, !electricvehicles@lemmy.world has more subscribers than !electricvehicles@slrpnk.net , but the slrpnk community was still chosen when the consolidation happened: https://lemm.ee/post/46935805

                If you’re afraid about losing the people, you just pin a post, point to the new community, similar to !casualconversation@lemmy.world, and that’s it.

                I did everything fair. “Not happy with the community? Create your own, and become the better one!”. I did, everything, and while we’ve had success, the LW staying open hinders the growth of that topic as a whole.

                You ask me to treat LW as any other instance, but no other instance is reacting in that way, preferring to keep some of their communities open when other people actively try to build an active community on a topic that apparently only a few people are interested in anyway.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know. I am still as opinionated and difficult as I ever was on Reddit, but I also turn it around, display civility, and cede points far more often here. Maybe I’m becoming better, but I think it’s just a better situation overall.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve received way more bitter and raged out responses here than I’ve ever received on Reddit for very lukewarm vanilla takes. I’m not saying Lemmy is full of extremists but there is a user base here that is all or nothing. My guess is it’s age related though.

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Overall the people here are nicer.

            The extremes are higher though - some people were booted from Reddit for a reason, and they came here.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yea. I agree. There is a nice median and really strong extremes. But those extremes sometimes hog up the convo.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The version of someone you invite in the door determines the initial trajectory of how that person will act in the community. You can invite in the leading edge of someone’s developing kindness or invite in the ossifying mass of their nature that is threatening to turn hateful and uncaring. No one instance of invitation to a new person (however that may happen, formally or informally) pushes the needle far either way within any one particular person (though sometimes it can radically do so) but the overall integrated effect is a moderate shift of the an entire community towards the better or worse version of the community members. When this effect is used for good people often describe the resulting community space as a community that accepts them for who they are or more succintly is a genuinely safe space.

          Of course, every interaction is in an invitation in some small way, it doesn’t just happen once.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t think anyone would ask you “Are you okay with sitting at the bar with nazis?” yet plenty will happily judge you for saying “I’d rather not have to deal with MAGAts and their opinions”

      Sorry but if your opinion is “trans people aren’t people” or “blacks need to know their place” then your opinion is shit and no the fuck I don’t have to listen to it

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        But another question, “are you ok with sitting at the bar with nazis, but they’re wearing red shirts with a hammer and sickle on them and espousing the same propensity for murder?”

        Lemmy is fine with murder and genocide so long as you wear the right shirt while doing it.

        Source: .ml, grad, hexbear.

  • OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just wish the top posts on the meme pages were more than just an anti-capitalist caption and a vaguely related image.

  • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s certainly a weakness, especially since the Lemmy echo chamber is ever more extremist than the echo chambers you’d find on a place like Reddit or Truth Social. But I don’t think it makes it uniquely bad. I wouldn’t worry about it too much.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Huge strength.

    The alternative is Reddit or 4Chan if you want centrist or right wing takes. I know which of the 3 platforms I want.

    Seeing this place run by individuals with a commitment to creating a better social environment is also a huge plus. You wouldn’t get that under a non-leftist platform.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “Left” or “Right” grouping is Western centric tho.

      From my perspective as Indonesian, it’s weird that Westerner lump politics into separate group instead working together for a solution that caters to everyone.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        So you would say PDIP and Gerindra both represent the same thing?

        And I know for a fact you’se spent most of the mid 20th century killing “communists” in your borders. So there certainly was a left in Indonesia.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Normally I’d say it was a weakness but the right has significantly departed from reality in most countries for way too long now. It’s incredibly rare to find a right-winger who can be present in a discussion without spewing a whole lot of vile conspiracy hate fascist bullshit.

    So I find their absence refreshing, desirable and a strength of Lemmy.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I find the same on the left wing. Everytime I put out a slightly right wing position I get attacked and a ton of down votes.

      Every time anyone mentions on Lemmy right wing positions it is with only to attack a strawman version that is very removed from what most right wing people think/do.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Downvotes can’t actually hurt you.

        Personally, I’m fine with saying unpopular things and getting downvoted for it. Mods removing a disallowed viewpoint is something different.

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just remember that the first person to say the world went around the sun got downvoted into oblivion… but it is factually accurate and a giant leap towards out current understanding of the physical realm. I’m happy for people to disagree with my views. Fuck, I probably disagreed with half of them, thirty years ago.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Mods removing a disallowed viewpoint is something different.

          They will only do that if the opinion actually resonates lol

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Haha yes, that’s usually the issue. I talked down below about getting banned on slrpnk because of some things I was saying. The comment thread with all the highly-upvoted replies getting removed by the mod, and the downvoted stuff intact, is hilarious to me:

            https://slrpnk.net/post/14823401/11895951

            The same mod also had a habit of arguing with people, while removing their comments but leaving his own side of the argument intact. He’s still a moderator there. In my opinion slrpnk needs to spend less time talking about anarchism and more time embodying anarchism.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Removed Comment I am gratified by the rate of downvotes on this. Greta Thunberg would, I think, be disappointed and angry that anyone would take what she said as a justification for ways to help get Trump elected. Let me highlight the very clearly written part that you seem to have missed: > It is probably Impossible to overestimate the consequences this specific election will have for the world and for the future of humanity. > > There is no doubt that one of the candidates — Trump — is way more dangerous than the other. If you want real positive change, listen to Greta and fight for change outside the system. If you want third parties, support RCV and proportional representation, to make them viable. If you want the end of the fucking world, then don’t vote, or vote for spoiler candidates within the current system that makes them unelectable. Edit: Formatting by PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat

              reason: Electoralism, liberalism

              well you did kinda invade their safe space with common sense ideas, shit lord hehe

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                “We’re anarchists.”

                “Cool. Here’s an urgent problem I see for the world that I think we should work on.”

                “SHIT COCK GET OUT DISALLOWED We don’t say that here. You’re receiving a gentle ban, to think about what you’ve done. Be better.”

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Oh my god… This is spot on. I feel like everyone here is mostly larping.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That’s the current modding situation across any community focused on working class politics… as if people running them are not interested in helping the peasants.

                  Why would anyone act like that on social media… for free at that

            • hono4kami@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I use solarpunk and disappointed that it happened to you. I felt like solarpunk was the best instance Lemmy has, it feels like it has the least amount of echo chamber. Maybe I’m wrong.

              I moderate my own community in solarpunk and I will try my best to not be like the moderator you talk about

              • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think you will see that these accusations have little substance, are taken out of context and argued in bad faith 🤷‍♂️

                • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  All I’ve done is link to the comments section illustrating what I was saying had happened, had happened.

                  Here he is, arguing with people while removing their comments and leaving his comments in place: https://slrpnk.net/post/14823401/11894346

                  I have no idea why you’re defending this guy. Like I said, the communities that try to “protect” their points of view, saying that one viewpoint is permitted in their space but other ones are will get you banned, generally become laughingstocks over time. It’s very different from protecting against abuse or racism, when you “protect” your space against people who don’t agree with some particular detail the way some particular person has interpreted it, and appoint an arbiter of what are the allowed interpretations, to ban anyone they disagree with. I think you should abandon that practice, and the censorship of ideas you disagree with, if you want to say that you’re supporting an instance that respects individual human freedom.

                  I don’t really have a problem with you in general, I was a little bit surprised that you came out swinging to defend this moderator. Maybe this all sounds like sour grapes on my part, but that is usually the result of banning people for disagreeing with you. It sparks a surprising amount of resentment.

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  What are you talking about… This is the experience of most of us that dare slightly disagree on anything. It shouldn’t be this way

      • Rimu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re comparing downvotes with “vile conspiracy hate fascist bullshit”. The behavior I’m talking about isn’t hurtful in the social-rejection way that downvotes are, it goes way way beyond that. Can you see the difference?

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I empathize, as a human being you have to realize that it is YOU that has to use politics as a tool & NOT BECOME a tool of Politics (Do you get what I mean) Use both Right & Left policies, I think it was called Moderatism or Communitarianism

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Every time anyone mentions on Lemmy right wing positions it is with only to attack a strawman version

        It would help if you would be more precise. You are using a “feels like” statement here, which I have to disagree with b/c it is objectively false: all it would take would be to find a singular example wherein it was not true, at which point “every time” is shown to be invalid.

        But often that does occur, yes. Sometimes our choice of wording can impede rather than aid in understanding?

        And I say this as someone who seems to be more often misunderstood than not, go figure :-|.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sure a counter example exists, but I’ve been around for year and not seen it yet. Though I’ll accept that the exception probably exists.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Please… this is a serious display of availability bias.

      Let’s face it: the demographic here is just a hyper concentrated version of Reddit, which itself is mostly middle-upper class tweenagers from affluent countries. They get online and get convinced that everyone is just like them.

      The average person that hangs out on Reddit-like forums absolutely does not represent the population at large, and any “right-winger who can be present in a discussion without spewing a whole lot of vile conspiracy hate fascist bullshit” has learned that there is no way one can have a reasonable exchange of ideas in any forum like this.

      • Squorlple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your points about social bubbles and echo chambers are true, but experiencing the displeasure of having to routinely interact with rightwingers in person verifies that they have fully-fledged conviction in their “vile conspiracy hate fascist bullshit”. They can’t have a reasonable exchange of ideas because they bring nothing reasonable or empathetic to the table.

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are many right wingers here, not conservatives. Liberals are right wing, and lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works are mainly liberal instances.

        What rimu was mainly talking about are conservatives, or even far right users. So he wasn’t criticizing the whole right wing, he just used the term right wing to refer to those.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I know it’s comfortable to sit and call anything slightly right of ultra socialism as ‘right wing’ but a spectrum exists.

          To conflate republican evangelical dominionist Christians with liberals is peak hubris.

          There is a saying: ‘when you’re a hammer, every problem is a nail’. When you reduce everything to class warfare you’re not engaging in an effective discourse to reduce harm in the world. You’re just pontificating on the merits of socialism, which yea, we all agree are neat. But so what? You think folding everyone else into a basket gives you credence or helps the discourse in any way?

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I wasn’t conflating. Conservatives are not liberals. But they are both right wing. (at least, classical liberals are)

            And there is more than just class warfare, i agree.

            But so what? why does it matter that they are right wing? not everyone has to be a communist.

            The term left and right are very ambiguous to define in the first place. Some people argue that leftism is anti-capitalism. Some argue that leftism is just belief in equality. They are all right. Same thing with the right wing.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think my issue is with the usage of the phrase “right wing” because we need something scathing to label liberals. It doesn’t really contribute anything to the discourse except create layers of exclusion.

              Liberalism, broadly, is not interested in supporting or enabling hierarchies. The only thing they share in common with right wing conservatism is the ownership of private property -but that’s it. So lumping them all in the same bucket isn’t doing much for anyone except creating more exclusion at the risk of pushing forward socialist policies. The reality is liberals are probably more likely to favor equality, even if it’s just ideological. Shouldn’t we strive to bring more people on board and build bridges rather than continue this bizarre war of artrition?

              Wikipedia: Right Wing Politics

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                My intent was not to cause division, I originally meant to clear things up for the user I was originally replying to, but things quickly descended into arguing about semantics. I agree that we should all work together to eliminate the rising threat of far right, fascist parties worldwide. That is what we should be focusing on.

                I’m tired over me bikeshedding, So i’m just going to forfeit out of this argument.

                Have a great weekend

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  We don’t have to have an argument over it. It’s ok to have a conversation. I’m familiar with the ‘liberals are right wing’ talking point.

                  I’m just trying to understand what exactly it is that defines ‘right wing’ and how we define ‘liberalism’ . You’re right, it IS a semantic discussion, but clearly the implication is that liberalism is on par with being right wing. So, nonetheless, a semantic relabeling which is not devoid of consequences.

                  So I’m wondering, at what point do those two overlap (liberalism and right wing politics)? Is it the right to private property? Beyond that, what exactly makes liberalism ‘right wing’?

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            They are? i’m not sure where you live, but most of the world considers them to be right wing.

            • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              but most of the world considers them to be right wing.

              Yep. I’m fiscally conservative, mildly sympathetic to people who fear and resist change, and fond of the pragmatic pursuit of libertarian ideals, where that’s possible.

              I also feel that how others do sex is none of my damn business, taxes supporting social services are necessary, and equitably applied rule of law is critical for any real economic prosperity.

              On the scale of history, I suspect that makes me centrist or even a moderate conservative.

              In my country, and today, somehow, astonishingly, this combination makes me what most would call very left leaning.

              I feel that the right has gone insane and continues to alienate people who might otherwise have been allies.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                In my country, and today, somehow, astonishingly, this combination makes me what most would call very left leaning.

                Let me guess, the US? The only people i’ve ever heard call liberals something as BS as far-left communists are conservative americans. The overton window in america is so ridiculous it’s hilarious.

            • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              No. Liberalism is against most things that the right wing of the political spectrum explicitly stands for. Liberalism exists as a counter argument to conservatism. As I mentioned earlier US political language has twisted and distorted what these words really mean.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Liberalism is against most things that the right wing of the political spectrum explicitly stands for

                I’m assuming you’re talking in a US perspective.

                Leftism describes a spectrum of political ideologies that seeks to minimize hierarchies and desires to achieve equality and egalitarianism. Liberalism is a pro-capitalist ideology, and capitalism is hierarchial and is unequal. Thus, liberalism is right wing. Progressivism isn’t related to right or left wing. You can be a communist but socially conservative. You can be fiscally conservative and be progressive. In the US, being left wing or right wing is mainly measured on how progressive, or if you support social programs (a little leftist, but still can be right wing, just center-right). Liberalism is right wing. Conservatism is far right.

                • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  No. I’m not talking from a US perspective. I’m talking from a political perspective. Liberalism is a moral and political philosophy - that is available in more than one flavour. Many things liberalism stands for are incompatible with right wing governments. Conservatism is far right? No, fascism is far right and there is an enormous difference between being conservative and being a fascist. Right and left are both part of a spectrum and run the whole gamut from dipping your toe in the water to being fully submerged. It’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise.