• GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    100
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is no middle road politician running. Harris by all accounts is firmly right wing.

    • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bruh I know the Overton window in the US is megafucked but she’s literally one of our most liberal politicians by voting record, she is not “firmly right wing” by any reasonable standard

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        79
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        She’s in favor of a fascist border policy against asylum seekers, a firm supporter of the fascist Zionist entity known as Israel, and wants to appoint members of the fascist party to her cabinet if she wins. She’s been endorsed by architects of the Iraq war and the US torture program.

        California’s top cop is right-wing.

        • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t mistake me for a Kamala Harris apologist- she is absolutely a huge centrist in her presidential campaign. I am tired of this false equivalency with the total fascist ilk she’s running against. It’s not useful and it’s dishonest.

          • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            2 months ago

            She is not a centrist, Bill Clinton was a centrist. With what she’s proposing, her actions, and the endorsements she’s fought for, she’s on par with Trump. She may not say the quiet parts out loud like trump, but her actions speak louder than the words she’s not saying.

            • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I hate to be pedantic but that’s almost exactly the definition of a centrist, someone who collaborates with both sides (even if one of those sides is fascist, genocidal, racist, etc.). And again, I don’t disagree, it’s a bad thing to be for exactly that reason. But it’s also a different thing than being explicitly a right wing authoritarian fascist like Trump is.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                2 months ago

                A centrist collaborates with the right and left (mostly the right), but fascists are to the right of the right. They’re far right, which is a distinct grouping from ordinary right-wing ideology. Fascist collaboration requires becoming right-wing, just to meet them halfway.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          She’s been endorsed by architects of the Iraq war and the US torture program.

          Because your daddy is worse in their eyes.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you find yourself agreeing with Dick Cheney on politics you might want to rethink your positions.

            He doesn’t like Trump because he’s a destabilizing element. He agitates the masses against him and does stupid shit for no reason that makes allies and adversarie alike stop trusting the US. He’s bad for business.

            Harris will be good for the empire. That’s it.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              If Dick Cheney told you he thought wearing a seatbelt was a good idea, you’d argue against him because clearly an idea is bad if a bad person has it.

              Evaluate an argument on its merits, regardless of who endorses it.

              • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                While true, that commenter is a very well known bad actor and provocateur. I recommend against engaging.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Obviously he’s not, like, a chaos demon. He presumably eats human food and all that.

                But he’s a monster and should be in prison, not giving endorsements. This is like being endorsed by Anders Brevik or some shit.

                She should have rejected the endorsement. Instead she’s embracing him. It’s disgusting.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              What if you find yourself agreeing with Repubs that you should vote for third parties over a Dem? Or is that different because saying so doesn’t support the pro-MAGA campaigning you are here for?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Republicans clearly prefer that people not vote at all, which is why they have put so much effort and money into disenfranchisement.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, let’s focus on the question, thanks. They want left-leaning people who are voting to do exactly what you plan to do. Does that mean you should rethink your positions? I mean, obviously not, you’re a MAGA campaigner. But in the context of your cosplay?

                  Somehow MAGA is worse than even Dick Cheney at this point and you are choosing to align with MAGA against the Dems. Meanwhile red-faced and screeching that Harris is accepting support from a former VP who has sway with people who might actually vote.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Okay, so, Republicans don’t just want people to vote third party. They’re very openly anti-libertarian and are kicking them off ballots, for example.

                    Their primary goal is to stop people from voting entirely, which is why the bulk of their money and legislative effort have gone into into disenfranchisement. Anyone choosing to sit this election out is definitely helping Republicans. And I am voting.

                    As for third parties, they only and specifically promote the Greens. Why them? It’s because Greens are an unserious protest vote and Republicans are fine with that.

                    That’s not me agreeing with you. Greens specifically are unserious because they’re just another liberal party, they have no revolutionary agenda or plan to build real political power. They’re just activism for the sake of activism. They show up every couple years and disappear between elections. Pure virtue signaling.

                    I’m voting PSL. You won’t see Republicans promoting them. Greens are harmless. Socialism scares them.

                    We need to build a workers’ party to fight the bipartisan dictatorship of capital. Build the workers’ party, build class consciousness, militarize the unions, agitate the masses, become ungovernable, arm the working class, movement building. That’s how we beat fascism. You won’t beat fascism by voting for fascist collaborators like Harris

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If by right wing you mean not strictly anti-capitalist, sure, at the end of the day shes not going to ovsrthrow capitalism. Still the policies and protections she wants to enact is the furthest left we’ve gone in multiple lifetimes. The last time we’ve had any kind of policy proposal like hers was likely FDR.

      • GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        FDR proposals, which directly came from a socialist, actually helped the working class. Our wages suck, our labor conditions sucks, our future prospects sucks, and we keep getting told everything is fine. She and democrats are not progressive in action, only in lip service.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do those accounts include the one where she just called for legalizing pot?

      Or is that a Right position in your mind?