• FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Every single time the administration does something fucked up or is about to do something fucked up, people always comment that this will be the final nail in the coffin and people will finally do something. What is the goddamn holdup? Why hasn’t something been done already? Why will this time be different? The camel’s back is vibranium.

        • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The best Americans can do is an organized protest on a weekend that doesn’t affect the economy, ensuring that it can be safely ignored.

          • CircaV@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Exactly this. Excuses excuses “I have to work” or “I have family” or “I have medical debt” and their country is literally a fascist kakistocracy.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      “California must not be allowed to gerrymander their districts in favor of Democrats that close to the election.”

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’d really only call one of them illegitimate (Goursch), unless you want to get in on other things like Clarence Thomas being a corrupt motherfucker who should be impeached and removed.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Founding fathers really had faith that bad actors would get impeached. Too many wolves in sheep’s clothing for that to happen though.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Depressing but not surprising. Their corruption aside, the argument is that it’s not race based because it’s partisan gerrymandering… which is the official (and fucked up) reason for the maps. Partisan gerrymandering is legal, for some reason.

    That said, race and politics are clearly intertwined so a bunch of black and brown folk are about to be disenfranchised. So long as the GOP remains the party of White Christian Nationalism, any partisan moves will continue to be racial ones inherently.

    • oyo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      They said that, while the suit in question contained tons of direct evidence that it was, in fact, racially based.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, that was one unique part about this one was the Texans said the quiet part out loud. Was obvious enough to the lower courts, anyway.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Somehow I feel this headline could be much shorter, more concise. Let’s see…

    SCOTUS SUCKS DON’S DICK AGAIN

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      honest query: conservatives hate popular vote / ranked choice / anything that cleans up the absurdities of the electoral college. how the fuck do we pass something like that with half the states fighting everything?

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So it doesn’t take half the states to pass it. It only takes enough states to make up half of the electoral votes. It could actually be done with as few as 12 states if those with the most electoral votes all agreed (though that requires Texas and Florida to join the compact). But even now, there are only 17 states and DC officially joined in the compact, yet that already makes up almost 39% of electoral votes. They will need some red or purple states to join too, to reach the number of course. There’s not enough electoral votes in all the solid blue states alone. Purple state Pennsylvania, and red states Kansas and South Carolina all have bills in committee to join. Were they all to pass, they’d have 45% of the electoral college in the compact.

        It’s to the benefit of hard red states too though. It will make their needs more of a priority for campaigning presidents instead of only Swing States being pandered to. The Swing states are the only ones that have a vested interest in preserving the status quo. And it’s not like Trump wouldnt be president now if the compact was triggered now (unfortunately) so it’s silly to pretend that it would prevent conservative presidencies.

          • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Why? Because sometimes the majority chooses fascists? So, of course that is always a risk, though it is a risk without the NPVIC too, clearly, and I think makes it more likely as well. But you also have to remember that the majority of voting eligible people do not vote regularly. There’s any number of reasons for that, but a major reason for it is winner-take-all states make states hard red or hard blue states. People who dont align with their states’ hard political lean justifiably feel like voting is pointless as their vote ultimately wont count towards the final decision. But if the NPVIC were in place, more people would have a good reason to turn out as their vote will actually count. And people who dont live in swing states will have to be given more concern from campaigns too.

            But ultimately, it is only a bandaid for a broken system. The electoral college is bullshit and so is Plurality voting. And frankly, voting should be compulsory and accommodated at every level. Make it compulsory, implement the Approval voting system for every election (eliminating the dominance of the two party system in the process), and the competition of ideas will make one party control of each branch, and thus run-away fascism, significantly harder to achieve. But then we seem to be already well too late for that.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It doesn’t take half the states, just half the states worth of electoral votes - and yeah, getting texas and florida… not likely. it’s an awesome idea, but the hurdles are real.

          It’s to the benefit of hard red states too though.

          they’ve never really voted to their own benefits if they conflict with the gop’s mission. see: everything

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh, I didn’t say I knew how to make that happen.

        Democrats when they’re in power promoting places like Puerto Rico and DC into states definitely wouldn’t hurt, though.

        Also, theoretically Trump getting less and less popular is probably helping its chances.

        And more awareness of the existence of the pact is definitely beneficial.

        Whether it’s likely to happen even if the above all happens, who knows.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    When do poor people get to stop following the rules? I don’t wanna pay taxes this year.