Lemmy: Bestiverse
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours ago

Omg

mander.xyz

message-square
40
fedilink
588

Omg

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours ago
message-square
40
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    nearly indestructible

    Yeah. Nearly. That’s why some got replaced with concrete to keep up appearances.

  • Enzy@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ah yes Rockhenge

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I mean if it was built out of anything else the destructible material has been looted or destroyed by now. You can say this about pretty much every old thing.

    Energy of this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mbyzgeee2mg

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why is a political website posting about Stonehenge…

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Heritage is a political resource.

      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jtsb.12353

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The druids designed Stonehenge in inches, but there was a mix-up and the contractor delivered the stones measured in feet.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      1000002732

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Basalt is pretty tough I hear

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As some one with experience in the rock crushing industry. Yes, yes it is

    • Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Barium salt? It’s got electrolytes.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    22 hours ago

    50% i am sure it is stone, the other 50%, henge.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Maybe we should be calling it “Stone/Henge” then

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

        • mech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Found the Slackware user.

        • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I will never get sick of this ridiculous copypasta

      • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s exactly how I’ve always pronounced it, too.

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Something I learned from QI

      Stonehenge is not a true henge, as its ditch runs outside its bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        The article you keep linking disagrees.

        Although having given its name to the word henge, Stonehenge is atypical in that the ditch is outside the main earthwork bank.

        An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

        Edit: Oops, mistook 2 basic pedants regurgitating trivia as the same person.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I keep linking…?

          An atypical example of something is still a “true” example of the thing, especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

          I think the article is a bit confused in both defining the “henge” and saying if it is a henge or not. It sets a definition that Stonehenge doesn’t follow, calls it “atypical”, says it’s not “true” henge (whatever that means) and so on. And all of those seem to be not directly sourced. One of the sources makes the confusion even worse:

          Ironically, even though Stonehenge has an earthwork circle around it (the earliest phase of the monument), it isn’t officially a ‘proper’ henge, as the main ditch is external to the main bank. It has to make do with being a ‘proto-henge’.

          I guess in this use it a “proper” (“true”?) henge is a henge and “proto-henge” is not a henge but a thing that precedes them. That’d explain some of the confusion. Could also be that “proto-henge” is counted as a form of a henge, but I’m not sure. Other examples seem to consider it preceding actual henges.

          It would help if there was one definition for henge but there seems to be some that define it like in the article, with the ditch inside and others that just include a ditch.

          especially given that the very term derives its origin from Stonehenge itself.

          Terms can change over time, it could be the definiton of “henge” has changed.

          • Wolf314159@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            deleted by creator

  • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    21 hours ago

    They reached this conclusion after they found a bunch of papers and scissors laying about

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nothing beats rock.

      • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So true!

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Bonus fun fact: Stonehenge is not a true henge!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henge#Etymology

    • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Stonehenge did nothing wrong. Henge is the imposter here. Henge came by and just decided to define itself differently to discredit Stonehenge. Henge will never succeed in its sick plot.

      • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        if we’re defining it by the ditch, then what is it?

    • potoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Oh my God, now we’re gatekeeping henges…

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Based on the title for The Hill, is it even stone?

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Oh damn you had already mentioned this!

  • danekrae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Indestructible, my ass.

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/stonehenge-visitors-used-be-handed-chisels-take-home-souvenirs-180949976/

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Wtf is wrong with people

    • brian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      20 hours ago

      but they weren’t destroying the rock, right? they were just splitting it up into smaller rocks. I bet they’d have a heck of a time actually destroying that rock.

      pretty undestructible if you ask me? /s

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Ah, the “stick vs.1000 us marines” conundrum

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          look i know a sure bet when i see one, and someone said that about the lewis light machine gun and 20,000 emus. I’m betting on the stick.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It can only be destroyed by throwing it into the heart of Mount Doom. Or other volcano.

  • Ravi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No it’s cake!

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    aLiEnS

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    …uh, your link is just to a stupid image.

  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    alien druid-engineers, foreseeing british hooliganism: yeah, can’t use sandstone here, folks. 👷‍♀️

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Is this Loss? This is Loss isn’t it

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.54K users / day
  • 5.8K users / week
  • 10.3K users / month
  • 21K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 18K subscribers
  • 5.64K Posts
  • 113K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org