• MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    NASA joke board. I’ve seen these type of boards all over. The best one was a board in a fiber splicing trailer.

    It outlined a procedure in case you were ever lost in the woods. It involved pulling a one foot section of fiber out of your back pack and burying it. Then you just had to wait until a backhoe came through and cut it in half. You were supposed to follow the backhoe back out.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    thank you OP for allowing me the opportunity to read this entire image here on lemmy prior to seeing the creator’s mastodon username, so that i could believe it was real for a minute :)

    (for anyone unfamiliar with it, check out her other amazing work…)

    also ping and thankyou to @NanoRaptor@bitbang.social (in case mentions on lemmy notify mastodon users?)

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Cognitive load of nested acronyms looks interesting. GNU is one that bakes my noodle.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Half of those are jabs at management, the other half are reasonable experiments.

    • Sphks@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I would love to see some of them, like the systems never intended to work (bottom left).

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I’m not sure they are as real as OP claims, unfortunately. I looked up NASA-TN-D-6193 for you, but its actual title is “Dynamic and static wind tunnel tests of a flow direction vane”.

        Edit: happily, the content of the paper really is about formalizing the performance rating of a device that had been used in conditions beyond its original intended use.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I also looked three of them up on the NASA Technical Report Server and got other results.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Did you really get other results, or did you get papers that were still accurately described by the editorialized titles? On the one I looked up, the author and publication date were the same, and it really was about “the repeated survival of systems never intended to work [under the more extreme than designed conditions they were subjected to]” even if the actual title wasn’t that spicy.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Oh shit, i didn’t consider that… I’ll look again later tonight. I wanted to check out the wobbly one. lol

  • meow@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Were just throwing science at the wall here to see what sticks” - Cave Johnson, shower curtain salesman of 1943

    I bet they just needed to do something, and they had ideas.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I looked multiple of these up on the NASA Technical Report Server and got other results.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Make it clipboard, reflective vest, and hard hat for construction sites.

      Clipboard and tracksuit for the training grounds of sportball teams.

      Clipboard and ridiculously expensive tracksuit for Silicon Valley.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The meetings ine is the silliest-sounding one, but maybe they mean collision of two materials or more, rather than setting a rock on the table in the board room.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Preliminary analysis of unexpected wobble in a rigidly non-wobbling system” is about that time when Simone Biles got the yips 😉