But in the end, the vote wasn’t even close: 31-19, with 21 Republicans joining all 10 Democrats in opposition. In fact, more GOP Hoosiers voted against the measure than for it.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jesus the quotes in this article are a real bleak loom into how fucked we are as a country:

    “Some will say these maps are political. Let me be clear,” Sen. Chris Garten ®, another backer, said as he slapped the lectern. “You’re God damn right they are!”

    and also:

    “President Trump has made it clear to Indiana leaders: if the Indiana Senate fails to pass the map, all federal funding will be stripped from the state,” Heritage Action wrote on X. “Roads will not be paved. Guard bases will close. Major projects will stop. These are the stakes and every NO vote will be to blame.”

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re explicitly saying it’s for political reasons because the supreme Court said gerrymandering for political reasons is just fine.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because semis put a ton of wear and tear on roads and Indiana is a huge bottleneck between the Northeast and the North/Northwest.

          If only there were a better way to move freight from one dedicated location to another dedicated location. If we could basically teleport goods between Chicago, Atlanta, Kansas City, and Dallas, THEN we’d be able to have semis (or even smaller trucks) only handle the more local portions, and we’d save easily billions on road maintenance.

          • joostjakob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            If only someone could invent a system where huge amounts of freight could be moved on something more durable than pavement. We can only dream of such technology of course.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I love how it papers over the fact the Republicans in Congress have abdicated all duty and made their own leader a king.

      Also, I would hazard that heritage action is some bullshit foreign account? Maybe Nigeria?

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sounds like it’s just a media arm of the Heritage Foundation (Koch’s are major backers), which is just homegrown fascism. No need to outsource that one.

  • slothrop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    It ain’t over until the obese treasonous traitor lying coward rapist convicted felon sings.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    The proposed map would have targeted Indiana’s two Democratic U.S. representatives to hand all 9 seats to the GOP.  Around 45% of Indiana’s party-affiliated voters are Democrats.

    So 45% of the constituents, 22% of the representatives.

    Sounds to me like they approved a GOP-gerrymandered map.

    • tauisgod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’ve been in control of the state for over 20 years, so yes. They carved out 2 tiny circles around 2 deep blue areas, and made the other districts much larger in comparison and diluted the blue votes there. I think Mitc Daniels was the last GOP governor (2005-2014) that wasn’t a total POS and he was still fairly regressive.

    • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So 45% of the constituents, 22% of the representatives.

      That’s not what that sentence is saying. Note the “party-affiliated” qualifier. I checked and according to the first search result I found 25% of Indiana voters are registered Democrat, 31% are registered Republican, and 44% are “unaffiliated”.

      Source: https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-stats/in

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That is exactly what the sentence is saying, unless you have reason to believe that the politics of the “unaffiliated” are drastically different from the affiliated. Going by your logic you would need to assume that the 44% unaffiliated are all republicans, which is very unlikely.

        Certainly it seems to be close to the presidential election results over the last 20+ years, at 58-40-2 for republican-democrat-other, respectively.

        Edit: and indeed, if you add up the 2024 congressional results you get 58-39-3 percent.

  • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    “When will I get credit for having created, with No Inflation, perhaps the Greatest Economy in the History of our Country?” Trump wrote, with characteristic hyperbole, in a post on his Truth Social network.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s obviously delusional and probably referring to the situation he inherited, and then immediately started to break when he took office…

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    No matter how you look at it, this is a headline that contain the words “Trump” and “blow” in the same sentence.

    Nice little bonus that it happens to be a situation where cheeto mcpedo doesn’t get his way.

  • watson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t think anyone expected this, which is what makes it all the more sweet and delicious.