• FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNTIED STATES IS CALLING FOR LAWMAKERS TO BE EXECUTED FOR UPHOLDING THE LAW! WTF IS GOING TO BE DONE ABOUT THIS SHIT?

  • asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Following the double negative rule: Anti Anti Fascists leaves you with

    Fascists

    The USA is dropping the mask for all the world to see.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      AND STILL PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE EVERYTHING IS NORMAL! AT THIS POINT I WANT TO SEE MASS PANIC SO I KNOW I’M NOT CRAZY! AND I’M IN CANADA, I WANT MASS PANIC IN CANADA! I AT LEAST WANT THIS SHIT TAKEN SERIOUSLY ENOUGH THAT CANADIANS STOP FUCKING GOING TO THE STATES AS IF EVERYTHING IS NORMAL!

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It would be nice if Canadians would also stop voting for politicians who lead Canada in the same direction as the USA. We need to turn left, not right.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    The symbol predates the Nazis coopting of it by a few thousand years. Used to mean peace forever or something. Only became the symbol of fascism because the Nazis misappropriated it

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Pre-WW2 use of the swastika: all good.

      Post-WW2 use of the swastika, specifically in the context of this discussion (for armed service members in the western world): very, very not good.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Combine this policy with declaring anti-fascists as terrorists, and I think a pattern is emerging here.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      55 minutes ago

      Ah, a potentially divisive hand gesture, inscrutable, controversial and puzzling. What on Earth could it mean?

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Instead, the Coast Guard will classify the Nazi-era insignia as ‘potentially divisive’ under its new guidelines. The new policy, set to take effect Dec. 15, similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag

    Threatening racial lynchings is “potentially divisive” but not hateful, apparently. I guess there are very fine people on both sides of the white supremacist lynchings debate.

  • signalsayge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think I see this differently than most. I’m all for this. This would make it so much easier to know who to kick out during the next administration.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh for a moment there I was beginning to doubt the direction of USA.
    Well I guess it’s still full steam ahead to dismantle democracy and introduce an authoritarian dictatorship.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How else are they going to hire people? Most guys that want to sign up are all tatted with these symbols.

  • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Brief anecdote. In school, we used to draw swastikas on everything in order to get others in trouble or to make ourselves seem like assholes. At no point did we consider what we were doing ok, it was just kids riding the edge of something they couldn’t understand for the sake of ignominy. Even we, as ignorant as we were, recognized that the swastika was a hate symbol and thoroughly unacceptable, we were, again, just assholes.

    I’ve been saying this quite a lot but this culture war bodes poorly.

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      On a similar tangent, I find hilarity in poorly drawn swastikas - or to use an entertaining but horrendously ablest term, a spastika.

      I make no apology for equating the sort of dickhead that scrawls this shit everywhere in adult life with the sort of clueless fuckwit that tests sockets with a fork, and couldn’t pour water out of a boot even if the instructions were on the soles.

      I don’t often like punching down on the lesser-intellectual folk (mainly because I’m dumb as rocks for 23 hours of the day myself) but this is one of the few times I enjoy the opportunity.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Damn been awhile since I’ve thought about a good old Hale Hortler. Thanks for reminding me that while I might be stupid I at least am better than these fuckwits.

  • xyzzy@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If you read between the lines, this is the clearest sign to date how much they’re struggling with recruiting for the armed forces.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I know its a drama we’re past by now but I can’t help but think about the people who defended Platner with the line “the military would have stopped him if it was really a Nazi tattoo.” Because most of us knew that in fact they would not, and now they have put it in writing.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      47 minutes ago

      Platner said that the marines actually rejected his reenlistment for having death’s head forearm tattoos (even though he says got it while in the marines and that it was a common tattoo for marines to have) so he had to join the army out desperation. He really was determined to go back over there and kill more brown people.

      Although reading it now it seems the marines rejected him for having visible tattoos on his arm.

      • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Can you give a source on that or a general direction on where to look? I’ve heard about the tattoo and looked into it during the initial controversy and did not find that information at the time.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          45 minutes ago

          I must’ve misread. He actually says the marines rejected him for having visible tattoos on his arm, not the actual skull tattoo.

          • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            48 minutes ago

            If you know about MARADMIN, can you elaborate on what he means? I looked it up and understand it as a kind of code of conduct, but don’t see what changed in 2007, just that he said a USMC based tattoo was what prevented him.

              • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                38 minutes ago

                Thanks anyway! Yeah military jargon and acronyms out the ass go hand in hand and any manager that’s a vet I’ve worked for just tosses them around like ‘sentence enhancers’.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        But I thought he didn’t know what it was? So he thought they rejected his reenlistement because of a regular skull tattoo?

        Sketchy af

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          He was in the Marines, they aren’t known for being particularly bright outside of maybe the specialists, NCOs, and COs. They ain’t called America’s greatest crayon eaters for nothing, but hey since the 80s or so theyve diversified their eating habits with MRE wrappers and chemical heaters.

          I grew up round Vietnam era army mud boots, I will take any opportunity to bash the Marines.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “Divisive.”

    I mean, COME ON guys, lets just meet halfway. They wear swastikas and SS uniforms, and you don’t complain anymore, it’s called COMPROMISE.

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “Don’t you see? Those people find civil rights offensive too! Why don’t we just compromise and only call klan hoods “divisive” rather than “hateful.” That will solve the issue!”

      7wl4vDjUFDGFFNq.png

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Pretty much every reddit comment section on default subs.

        At least before most people got replaced by bots.