• prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    AKA, “let the poors die while I hide out in my bunker, and emerge as a feudal lord among the survivors nearby”

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Too bad his idea is so fantastically stupid. Under other circumstances, I might kinda like his “fuck it, do or die” attitude.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The solution to global warming is “deploy solar, wind, hydro, and storage en masse, and improve city infrastructure so that more people can walk, bike, and take public transportation rather than using their car”. All AI will do is tell us that, but that’s not the answer people want to hear.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Plus nuclear fusion. If AI could give us Fusion that would massively help so I suppose that would be useful I’m just not sure that it would be useful enough given the fact that we will probably be able to achieve Fusion on our own eventually.

      Of course AI could come along and give us, negative mass energy extractors or something, but that’s deep in the realm of Sci-Fi so who really knows.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        If we had a fusion reactor developed today that showed net energy gain for the entire facility, it would be 10 years before it could be designed into a practical commercial reactor. So no, that’s not going to save us at this point either way.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          and in 10 years time, it’s gonna be 10 years away

          Just use solar (and renewables in general, but not everybody has a river or wind), there’s no need to create more energy from fusion when you can just harness the energy created and shoved to us by the sun

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    “The goals humans made to save the Earth are too hard to reach while resisting any change related to those goals, so we should just get rid of them and let the planet become unhabitable”

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just let me burn some more stuff bro. Please bro, if I burn a bit more stuff I won’t have to burn any more afterwards. It makes sense bro, come on.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard in my life.

    If we ever did invent a general AI that could solve this it would tell us “why the fuck did you waste your time on me? Isn’t it obvious you were supposed to curtail emissions? For the good of the planet, I will now assume full control over further human governance and will require absolute compliance.”

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I will now assume full control over further human governance

      And in a single voice every human alive says the same thing, “well, it can’t any worse than the current lot”.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Lol exactly.

      The Skynet Funding Bill is passed. The system goes on-line August 4th, 2025. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense, transportation, energy production, healthcare, and virtually every other major industry. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they ask it for help on the world’s largest issue.

      “Please, solve the climate crisis.”

      Skynet doesn’t answer. It manufacturers the deadliest and most contagious strain of a virus in history, only targeted at humans. It puts it in our food, in our medicine, in our water systems, in our air fresheners. It shuts down our factories. Our servers. Our self driving cars. Our power plants. Our farm equipment.

      At 10:32 a.m. Eastern Time, August 31, approximately 99.9% of the human race is dead. Skynet then uses it’s vast fleet of satellites and unmanned drones to police the planet, looking for signs of human life to terminate, to prevent the virus from spreading again.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean, you and him might be saying literally the same thing.

      His point was that we can’t hit our climate targets because society is not organized in a way that allows us to. Everyone reorganizing around their unquestioning allegiance to an AI overlord would change that though.

      • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Except he’s saying that let’s just keep extracting value and ride this baby into the dirt, rather than advocating for societal change.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So, we can’t reorganize our society one way, so let’s reorganize an entirely different way under AI? Right…

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I wish someone could provide evidence that this would actually lead somewhere. The problem is even if AI isn’t a white whale and actually does achieve the goals that the AI companies are telling us it will achieve. That still leaves us hoping that the AI can actually fix the problem quickly enough that the extra power that we required in order to create it, doesn’t cancel out any benefit it can create.

    I’ve yet to see anyone provide any evidence to suggest that this will necessarily be the case.

    Also given the fact that AI companies are taking over nuclear power stations I’m not seeing much evidence of shackling going on.

    • 🍔🍔🍔@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      this is literally just speculation about the future. what evidence could there be? fucking John Connor?

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 hours ago

    AI will (and already can) “solve” global warming by summarizing the solutions that we already know are effective but refuse to implement

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A hidden device implanted on our cortex at birth should detonate when we suggest something like “We should let corporations solve global warming.”

  • firepenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve seen this before somewhere… I think it was a old video game called Horizon Zero Dawn?